Re: [OPSAWG] TSV ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel

2016-11-02 Thread Joe Touch
owever, the authors have decided to only talk some essential ones in this > draft, and perhaps talk about others in latter drafts if necessary. It might be helpful to indicate that this is how other tunnel types are being handled, so they don't appear to be omitted for other reasons. >

Re: [OPSAWG] TSV ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel

2016-10-18 Thread Duzongpeng
s have decided to only talk some essential ones in this draft, and perhaps talk about others in latter drafts if necessary. [duzongpeng] -Original Message- From: OPSAWG [mailto:opsawg-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari Sent: Tuesday, October 04, 2016 5:50 AM To: Joe Touch Cc: op

Re: [OPSAWG] TSV ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel

2016-10-03 Thread Warren Kumari
[ - Discuss, tsv-art (first for clutter, second because I'm not subscribed) ] Dear authors, I just wanted to make sure that you had seen these are well... W On Mon, Sep 26, 2016 at 5:36 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > CC'ing tsv-art... > > > On 9/26/2016 2:34 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > Hi, all, > > I've r

Re: [OPSAWG] TSV ART IETF LC review of draft-ietf-opsawg-capwap-alt-tunnel

2016-09-26 Thread Joe Touch
CC'ing tsv-art... On 9/26/2016 2:34 PM, Joe Touch wrote: > > Hi, all, > > I've reviewed this document as part of the Transport Area Review > Team's (TSVART) ongoing effort to review key IETF documents. These > comments were written primarily for the transport area directors, but > are copied to t