Re: [OPSEC] Reminder: Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements

> On Apr 18, 2018, at 8:20 AM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) > wrote: >> Let me mention that I think the WG should also consider potential use of >> RPKI as a complementary mechanism to improve uRPF. Namely, if there is an >> ROA for the prefix-origin pair, it should

Re: [OPSEC] Reminder: Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements

Amir, >I support the adoption of "draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements" as an >OPSEC Working Group document. Thank you. > >Let me mention that I think the WG should also consider potential use of >RPKI as a complementary mechanism to improve uRPF. Namely, if there is an >ROA for the

Re: [OPSEC] Reminder: Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements

Hi, On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 08:21:48AM +1200, Barry Greene wrote: > Then you have this statement "It is well known that this method has > limitations when networks are multi-homed and there is asymmetric routing of > packets.??? That is false. BCP84 is wrong. uRPF has been deployed with >