Re: [OPSEC] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: (with COMMENT)

Hi Alvaro, Thank you very much for your detailed review. Together with my co-authors, we have uploaded revision -27, which should address all your comments. The diff is at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-27 Regards, KK On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 8:27 AM Alvaro Retana

Re: [OPSEC] Roman Danyliw's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-v6-26: (with COMMENT)

Hi Roman, Thank you very much for your detailed review. Together with my co-authors, we have uploaded revision -27, which should address most of your comments except a few listed below with our rationale: ** Section 2.1.5. Per “However, in scenarios where anonymity is a strong desire

Re: [OPSEC] Zaheduzzaman Sarker's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: (with COMMENT)

Hello Zahed, Thank you very much for your detailed review. Together with my co-authors, we have uploaded revision -27, which should address all your comments. The diff is at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-27 Regards, KK On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:33 AM Zaheduzzaman

[OPSEC] opsec - Update to a Meeting Session Request for IETF 111

An update to a meeting session request has just been submitted by Jen Linkova, a Chair of the opsec working group. - Working Group Name: Operational Security Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure Area Name: Operations and