Re: [OPSEC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)

Adam, > On Aug 20, 2019, at 23:29, Adam Roach via Datatracker > wrote: > > §3.3: > > I believe I understand how the described Algorithm B, is applied by AS4, will > result in acceptance of AS1's packets from AS2. I'm a bit lost, however, about > the means by which AS2 will accept them such

Re: [OPSEC] Reminder: Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements

> On Apr 18, 2018, at 8:20 AM, Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed) > wrote: >> Let me mention that I think the WG should also consider potential use of >> RPKI as a complementary mechanism to improve uRPF. Namely, if there is an >> ROA for the prefix-origin pair, it should

Re: [OPSEC] Reminder: Call for WG adoption of draft-sriram-opsec-urpf-improvements

Barry, On Apr 17, 2018, at 3:21 PM, Barry Raveendran Greene > wrote: On Apr 18, 2018, at 01:48, Ron Bonica > wrote: Any comments, positive, negative or indifferent would be appreciated. It is difficult