Re: [OPSEC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)

2019-08-21 Thread Sriram, Kotikalapudi (Fed)
Hi Adam, Thank you for the comments. >Thanks for a clearly written document. . Thank you. Nice of you. >The one term I had to go searching for was "stub AS". I have defined stub AS in my author's draft for the next version. Done. > Please use the boilerplate from RFC 8174. Yes,

Re: [OPSEC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)

2019-08-21 Thread Jeff Haas
Adam, > On Aug 20, 2019, at 23:29, Adam Roach via Datatracker > wrote: > > ยง3.3: > > I believe I understand how the described Algorithm B, is applied by AS4, will > result in acceptance of AS1's packets from AS2. I'm a bit lost, however, about > the means by which AS2 will accept them such

[OPSEC] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: (with COMMENT)

2019-08-20 Thread Adam Roach via Datatracker
Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-opsec-urpf-improvements-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please