> On Jul 16, 2016, at 8:38 PM, Howard, Lee wrote:
>
> 4.3 You say lawful intercept can target “single host (a /128 target)” but if
> the client is using privacy extensions, that will not be enough detail.
It's theoretically possible to target a single address. However, practically
speaking,
Markus
Thanks very much for your review, I know it takes time to do.
I have accepted most of them except those marked with EVY>>
Thanks again and see you in Berlin, your ::1 ;-)
-éric
From: Markus deBruen
mailto:linke...@xn--debrn-nva.de>>
Date: Wednesday 15 June 2016 at 07:04
To: Eric Vynck
Fred,
First thank you for the review, to be honest I was unaware that per RFC
2119 "SHOULD" was a synonym of "RECOMMENDED" ;-) And you suggestion of
listing all recommendations is indeed a good idea (but I am afraid that we
won't have time to add it for the -09 rev).
All other comments are accept
One thing I wondered about as reading this - many and perhaps most sections
gave a fairly informative comment, and then made one or two recommendations. I
wonder (this is a question) whether it would be worthwhile capitalizing
"RECOMMEND", both in the sense of defining the term (RFC 2119) and hi
Hi Eric,
the draft is very well written and contains useful guidance/recommendations.
Sections 2.4 and 2.5 do not contain much IPv6-specific information and sections
2.7.2.* do not give much guidance. However, these three sections together
amount to ~11 pages (1/3 of the document). If you coul
5 June 2016 11:50
To: opsec@ietf.org; v6...@ietf.org
Cc: Howard, Lee; fg...@si6networks.com; draft-ietf-opsec...@ietf.org;
linke...@xn--debrn-nva.de
Subject: [OPSEC] Asking for a review of draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08
The authors (and OPSEC WG chairs) would really appreciate if a review of
https://tools.ietf
The authors (and OPSEC WG chairs) would really appreciate if a review of
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-opsec-v6-08 is done in the coming
days/weeks (in time to submit a -09 in case it needs to be amended).
This I-D is about the operation security considerations when operating an IPv6
n
