The WGLC on this document is now closed and the outcome if positive.
Authors, would you mind submitting a revised version addressing the comments of
Darren Dukes (see below) so that we can submit this revision to the IESG queue.
-éric & -ron
On 30/05/2018, 20:30, "OPSEC on behalf of Darren Dukes (ddukes)"
<opsec-boun...@ietf.org on behalf of ddu...@cisco.com> wrote:
Section 3.4.2.5 contradicts section 3.3 on handling of unknown RHT’s.
Section 3.4.2.5 contradicts section 3.4.2.4 assessment of operational
impact.
It appears to me that 3.4.3.5 should state:
Intermediate systems should discard packets containing a RHT0 or
RHT1. Other routing header types should be permitted.
_______________________________________________
OPSEC mailing list
OPSEC@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/opsec
