Hi,
Sorry for the late response, I was away due to sickness.
Thanks for addressing my comments. However, I still think if section 2.3.4 is
not specific to certain generation of 3GPP link/network architecture then it is
better to either use possible generic terminologies or include 5G
Hello Zahed,
Thank you very much for your detailed review.
Together with my co-authors, we have uploaded revision -27, which should
address all your comments.
The diff is at: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-opsec-v6-27
Regards,
KK
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 3:33 AM Zaheduzzaman
Zaheduzzaman Sarker has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-opsec-v6-25: No Objection
When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)
Please refer to
