Re: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:10:45PM +0100, Arrakistor wrote: I mean, the latest torpark is great and all, but does it warrant 40,000 unique visitors? I don't really think so. I'm really surprised. Hi Steve, Can you enlighten us about the current status with respect to following the

Re[2]: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Arrakistor
Roger, At the bottom of the page is the download for the source code. In that tarball is the licenses. Also, inside each distribution of Torpark I have also included the licenses. I see that there's a link to a source tarball at the bottom of http://torpark.nfshost.com/ but a) I don't see

Re: Tor 0.1.1.19-rc is out

2006-05-10 Thread Landorin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi, nice work, that Vidalia tool seems to be a very good addition for Tor, it keeps the overview and allows an easier way of setting up the Tor configuration. However, where do I send feedback to? Will it do sending it to this mailing list or should

Roger: Vidalia

2006-05-10 Thread Arrakistor
Roger, Where can I get a copy of the Vidalia source code? Regards, Steve

Re: Roger: Vidalia

2006-05-10 Thread Matt Edman
On May 9, 2006, at 10:44 PM, Arrakistor wrote: Roger, Where can I get a copy of the Vidalia source code? We have a link to the tarball for our latest release on the downloads page: http://www.vidalia-project.net/download.php You can also fetch the latest development snapshot or sources

Re[2]: Roger: Vidalia

2006-05-10 Thread Arrakistor
Matt, Perfect! I am very pleased with your software. I like the interface, I'm working on something similar for a multi-platform release of a Tor extension for Firefox. Steve

Re: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Sebastian Wiesinger
* Jan Reister [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-05-10 09:47]: Hi Steve, Can you enlighten us about the current status with respect to following the licenses of Firefox, Portable Firefox, and Tor? Torpark was also featured on Newsforge yesterday:

Re: Tor 0.1.1.19-rc is out

2006-05-10 Thread Matt Edman
On May 10, 2006, at 4:36 AM, Landorin wrote: However, where do I send feedback to? Will it do sending it to this mailing list or should I send it directly to the author? We have some contact information here: http://trac.vidalia-project.net/wiki/Contact The only thing I noticed was when

Re: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Geoffrey Goodell
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 02:46:57AM +0100, Arrakistor wrote: Roger, At the bottom of the page is the download for the source code. In that tarball is the licenses. Also, inside each distribution of Torpark I have also included the licenses. I see that there's a link to a source

Re: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Geoffrey Goodell
On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:23:05AM -0400, Geoffrey Goodell wrote: The site may crash, change location, or creash. I don't know what 'creash' is, but it sounds really bad. :) Geoff signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Christopher W.
Geoffrey Goodell said the following on 5/10/2006 7:24 AM: On Wed, May 10, 2006 at 07:23:05AM -0400, Geoffrey Goodell wrote: The site may crash, change location, or creash. I don't know what 'creash' is, but it sounds really bad. :) Geoff a creash is what happens when a

Re: Re[2]: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Eric H. Jung
Perhaps this has already been made clear to others, but it's becoming more apparent to me that Torpark is an installer/configuration script. IOW, there *is* no other source code unique to Torpark except the NSI installation script. Perhaps when people download the tarball and see only the NSI and

Re: Re[2]: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Jake Appelbaum
On Wed, 2006-05-10 at 06:09 -0700, Eric H. Jung wrote: Perhaps this has already been made clear to others, but it's becoming more apparent to me that Torpark is an installer/configuration script. IOW, there *is* no other source code unique to Torpark except the NSI installation script. Perhaps

Re[4]: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Arrakistor
Jake, et al It appears that the CORALized mirrors had not updated the version of the source tar it was distributing. I've replaced it with a direct download from the server. It includes all licenses, directions on how to build torpark, and is fully license compliant. The tor.exe and

Re[4]: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing

2006-05-10 Thread Michael J Freedman
On Wed, 10 May 2006, Arrakistor wrote: Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 12:59:20 +0100 From: Arrakistor [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: or-talk@freehaven.net To: Jake Appelbaum or-talk@freehaven.net Subject: Re[4]: TorPark mentioned on BoingBoing Jake, et al It appears that the CORALized mirrors had not

Re: Tor 0.1.1.19-rc is out

2006-05-10 Thread Ringo Kamens
I read the changes and I didn't notice any security updates. Is there any reason for non-server owners or people without errors to update? On 5/10/06, Matt Edman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On May 10, 2006, at 4:36 AM, Landorin wrote: However, where do I send feedback to? Will it do sending it to