On 3/6/07, Roger Dingledine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
So the moral of the story appears to be turn the plugins off, period.
The broader moral is: don't run code from strangers on your computer. The
even broader moral would be to lament that we're still not using SSL on
most Internet
OK, we heard a lot of technical details, I'll cover the non-tech part of it.
On 3/7/07, Fergie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments?
Yes, it's stupid.
First, the legal issues. What he does is overtaking a TOR-user's
machine by malicious code. He's accusing people of being childporn
consuments
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 02:50:34PM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
OK, we heard a lot of technical details, I'll cover the non-tech part of it.
On 3/7/07, Fergie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Comments?
Yes, it's stupid.
Well, it sounds like a pretty thorough implementation of a well-known
On Wednesday, March 07, 2007, at 07:42AM, Roger Dingledine [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 12:56:22AM -0500, James Muir wrote:
http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=114
The approaches suggested won't work if you use Firefox with NoScript set
to disable JavaScript, Java,
O.K. I've been biting my tongue on this one for a while now. I'll try to
keep this short as it is not specifically TOR related
As a survivor of childhood sexual abuse. I'm personally getting annoyed
by this whole nab the paedophiles thing. for several reasons:
1.) 90+ percent of sexual abuse of
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:29:43AM -0500, Paul Syverson wrote:
[...]
My kneejerk response is
that (a) the overhead from this vs. everything else in Tor is very
small,
This was one of the major reasons for not doing it at the same time as
CREATE_FAST. Assuming that TLS conns are mostly
RE:
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Mar-2007/msg00035.html
Mr. Mathewson wrote
Again, if any of these warnings actually trigger in
the code, please let me know.
While not an error specified in the message above I
did experience an error when I tried to compile on my
Edgy Eft: (I could send
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:59:13AM -0800, light zoo wrote:
checking for libevent directory... configure: error:
Could not find a linkable libevent. You can specify an
explicit path using --with-libevent-dir
I had the libevent1 package libevent1_1a-1_i386.deb
installed before I
I've seen a VM that routes all traffic over TOR, invisibly to the O/S.
(Not sure what they do about UDP).
Developed at Georgia Tech.
One better .. TOR on OpenWRT on a Linksys router.
Tor at the *hardware* level.
~Mike.
checking for libevent directory... configure: error:
Could not find a linkable libevent. You can specify an
explicit path using --with-libevent-dir
./configure --with-libevent-dir=/usr/local/lib
that got it working for me (also Ubuntu 6.10 here, but the gnome variety)
Thus spake Freemor ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I think what needs to be done here is to create a FAQ or other standard
document that will 1.) inform the vastly misinformed public. 2.) list
places and ways they can make a difference.
Excellent post, even if slight off-topic. As suggested on IRC, I
As suggested on IRC, I think
the Tor documentation strategy needs to be rethought. Most people
barely read the download page, let alone the reems of FAQ questions.
We've had two attacks now on Tor that rely on unmasking users who
use Tor incorrectly. One of them actually published a paper and
Thus spake Paul Syverson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
I don't think it was off topic. To repeat what I already said in
an individual response.
I think it was not OT since your post addressed the reality of a
situation for which people were designing Tor modifications and
deployments and you
Heheh, well speaking of dreaming big, while both what you and Jason
Edwards said are great goals to have, I think we shouldn't get
distracted from stopping the bleeding now with a few sentences right
up front while something more elaborate is devised (or a volunteer
steps up).
The problem is if
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:53:08PM -0500, James Muir wrote:
Heheh, well speaking of dreaming big, while both what you and Jason
Edwards said are great goals to have, I think we shouldn't get
distracted from stopping the bleeding now with a few sentences right
up front while something more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
well,
1.) Skype Call Traced
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Aug-2006/msg00232.html
and
http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/Aug-2006/msg00252.html also directly relevant
to my point
2.) need i mention skype is closed-source?
and
3.) when starting
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 10:35:54PM -0500, Paul Syverson wrote:
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 09:53:08PM -0500, James Muir wrote:
Heheh, well speaking of dreaming big, while both what you and Jason
Edwards said are great goals to have, I think we shouldn't get
distracted from stopping the bleeding
17 matches
Mail list logo
