...
These are the extensions I use:
...
Flashblock
...
Assuming add-ons work as intended. For example (just an example, nothing
against flashblock):
Firefox 2.0.0.2 (Fresh install).
Install Flashblock
Visit Youtube (or any other page with flash)
Flashblock seems to be working but...
Disable
Hi,
Forgive the naive nature of this question...
I have compiled Tor and I want to run it off my USB
HDD but I'm not sure how. Should I just copy over the
build directory ~/tor-0.1.2.10-rc/? If so what are
essential files?
What should the "DataDirectory" option be set to?
Regards,
_
Almost On Topic (related, anyway): http://www.thelocal.se/6619/20070307/
"A far-reaching wiretapping programme proposed by Sweden's government to
defend against foreign threats, including monitoring emails and telephone
calls, has stirred up a fiery debate in the past few weeks, with critics
de
Fergie wrote:
> -- James Muir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> The following recent preprint deals with the subject of this thread:
>
>> A. Kate, G. Zaverucha and I. Goldberg
>> Pairing-Based Onion Routing pdf
>> CACR 2007-08
>
>> http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2007/cacr2007-08.p
It was the Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) Universal Binary 0.1.1.29 bundle. When
I open OSX/Library/Tor I do not see an uninstall script. Any
suggestions?
Jay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:40:28AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.4K bytes in
16 lines about:
: I installed
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 01:40:28AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.4K bytes in
16 lines about:
: I installed the bundled package posted on the site last week. I don't
: know the Terminal well but this is what I get back...
Which bundle? And does the uninstall script exist in
/L
James Muir wrote:
> The following recent preprint deals with the subject of this thread:
>
> A. Kate, G. Zaverucha and I. Goldberg
> Pairing-Based Onion Routing pdf
> CACR 2007-08
>
> http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/techreports/2007/cacr2007-08.pdf
>
> -James
>
Nice. Patents are going to be
Hi all,
I've been thinking about how exit and entry nodes controlled by the same
adversary can easily determine if they are in the same circuit due to the
predictable nature of circuit set-up (timing). Well, what about altering that?
Perhaps Tor nodes should form long-lived "exploratory" circuit
On Fri, 2007-09-03 at 10:55 -0800, light zoo wrote:
> --- Freemor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > so my questions are:
> >
> > 1 - Can a modified actions file be made that
> > would strip all Java/javascript, flash, steaming
> > media, etc. From looking at the Privoxy
> > documentation i
--- Freemor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> so my questions are:
>
> 1 - Can a modified actions file be made that
> would strip all Java/javascript, flash, steaming
> media, etc. From looking at the Privoxy
> documentation it looks possible so far (but I'm no
> privoxy guru)
(Note: Mr. Keil
This would have to support all sorts of variations for media files:
document.location = something.ext
meta refresh URL=something.ext
iframe src=something.ext
frame src=something.ext
img src=something.ext (some cases)
bgsound=something.ext
..etc
Seems easier to lock down the browser and prevent a
On 9 Mar 2007 03:21:05 -0600, Mike Perry wrote:
>
> Just tested windows media player 10 plugin, which I believe is
> installed by default on pretty much every windows box.. It ignores
> proxy settings. Great.
>
I found most applications on a Windows system respect the settings
configured under I
I've been watching this thread with some interest and as the Talk of
mis-onfigured browsers and mis-behaving plug-ins grew I found myself
thinking that there must be an easier way to fix the problem. It occured
to me that what is needed (at least until a more permenant solution can
be found) is a w
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 14:02 -0500, Michael Holstein wrote:
> > I've seen a VM that routes all traffic over TOR, invisibly to the O/S.
> > (Not sure what they do about UDP).
> > Developed at Georgia Tech.
>
> One better .. TOR on OpenWRT on a Linksys router.
>
> Tor at the *hardware* level.
WR
The approaches suggested won't work if you use Firefox with NoScript set
to disable JavaScript, Java, Flash and any other plugins.
Agreed. Firefox work better on security site nor IE is a big hole.
Cesare
If TOR would legally qualify as an ISP, we're in deep trouble.
Keyword: the upcoming data-retention laws in Europe.
Data retention in Europe doesn't cover the content of traffic, only
CDR (call data record) are covered and gathered all togheter for LI
purpose.
Telecoms providers will now have t
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:14:31AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:17:09PM -0600, Mike Perry wrote:
> > > The current simplest advice I can give people is to remove all plugins:
> > > http://tor.eff.org/download.html.en#Warning
> > > Do you have any suggestions on safe w
repeat after me: it's "Tor", _NOT_ "TOR" :)
On 3/9/07, Alexander W. Janssen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
No; the point is if you'd qualify as an "access provider" you need to
enable "relevant logging". ETSI already defined interfaces and
data-sets which would come quite handy.
i have a pol
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 03:14:31AM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> I'm not comfortable recommending portable firefox yet, due to a problem
> that Steven Murdoch found a while ago: when firefox starts up, it hunts
> around on your hard drive to see if there are any plugins, and then it
> enables th
Thus spake H D Moore ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Flash is now supported:
> http://metasploit.com/research/misc/decloak/
Tested on FF2.0.0.2 for Windows.. Turns out I was mistaken about the
UDP packet. It was from your technique #1 doing the DNS request for
the image fetch. Guess I need some sleep..
T
Thus spake Roger Dingledine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Also, isn't Portable Firefox Windows-only? Or am I confused?
True, just going for what I assume is the majority of our
userbase first. Especially people who are going to have difficulty
with this stuff. Was also in a rush and didn't check out the
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 08:33:29PM -0600, H D Moore wrote:
> Seems like two big items I need to add to decloak are Flash and the shiny
> no-proxy Java connection mode (which seems to apply to TCP sockets only).
What does the current Torpark ship with? It would seem like a hardened
version of Fir
On 3/9/07, Eugen Leitl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:37:58AM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> If TOR would legally qualify as an ISP, we're in deep trouble.
We don't provide access to the Internet, and we're not charging
for it. Last time I looked the data retention
On Thu, Mar 08, 2007 at 07:17:09PM -0600, Mike Perry wrote:
> > The current simplest advice I can give people is to remove all plugins:
> > http://tor.eff.org/download.html.en#Warning
> > Do you have any suggestions on safe ways to back off from that?
>
> I have a couple more points - the second b
On Fri, Mar 09, 2007 at 08:37:58AM +0100, Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
> If TOR would legally qualify as an ISP, we're in deep trouble.
We don't provide access to the Internet, and we're not charging
for it. Last time I looked the data retention laws also allowed
a loophole for very small provider
25 matches
Mail list logo
