Thus spake Koh Choon Lin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >> If you can't or don't want to switch ISP you could
> >> rent a server with uncensored net access and use
> >> it as proxy.
>
> I am working in Singapore and the government branded Tor as "criminal
> skills". Thus, I have to go through a proxy eve
>> Polipo/tor was still 13% faster?
> To which numbers are you referring here?
Sorry, I got confused.
> However if I understand you correctly, you're saying that
> I intentionally...
My apologies, I got carried away.
Juliusz
[CC-ing polipo-users again]
>> this is an HTTP/1.0 site. There are fortunately very few of these
>> left nowadays.
> What exactly is the problem with the site? Watching the circuits in
> Vidalia I had the impression that Polipo used keep-alive.
HTTP/1.0 keepalives and HTTP/1.1 persistent conne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Karsten, (strange to write that *g*)
> do you run a TOR server on a virtual server without connection faults?
> A year ago, I tested a tor server on virtual hardware (Virtuozzo) and I
> got many TCP connection faults in "/proc/user_beancounters".
>
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > With http://www.kde.org/screenshots/:
>
> So according to this test, this page downloads roughly two times
> faster through Polipo/tor than through Privoxy/tor, right?
It certainly did for the five samples I took.
> > I also tested with another
> With http://www.kde.org/screenshots/:
So according to this test, this page downloads roughly two times
faster through Polipo/tor than through Privoxy/tor, right?
> I also tested with another website (http://www.spiegel.de/):
This test is not representative: this is an HTTP/1.0 site. There are
[CC-ing the Polipo-users list]
> Speaking of which, it occurred to me a little while ago that
> persistent connections between the http proxy and the website,
> through Tor, can have an impact on anonymity.
> If the user is figuring they're rotating their connections over
> different Tor circuits
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> I would like to contribute some more Tor servers running at different
> providers across Germany (probably not in the same /16 network). My
> current server is a virtual server at 1blu that has a bandwidth of 931
> KB/s which makes it the 71st fastes
Juliusz Chroboczek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael Gersten:
>
> > getting keep-alive to work will help a lot with web browsing,
>
> Fabian Keil:
>
> > Is this an assumption or did you just forget to show your benchmarks
> > to back this claim up?
>
> I've just tested this by running
>
>
> Do you think it's a privacy problem to run 3 to 5 servers? All servers
> would be non-exit servers because of the current habit of the German
> police to collect all exit servers. Of course, I will set the family entry.
Please do run as many servers as you can afford. There is absolutely no
pri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> What kind of traffic plan to you have with 1blu, and how much do you
> pay for it?
They offer "1blu-vServer Unlimited" with unlimited traffic volume for 17
euros per month. I don't know if it's the best offering, so I decided to
give them a try. Are
On Wed, Apr 18, 2007 at 11:45:15AM +0200, Karsten Loesing wrote:
> I would like to contribute some more Tor servers running at different
> providers across Germany (probably not in the same /16 network). My
> current server is a virtual server at 1blu that has a bandwidth of 931
What kind of traf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
this question is not directly related to the described case.
I would like to contribute some more Tor servers running at different
providers across Germany (probably not in the same /16 network). My
current server is a virtual server at 1blu that
13 matches
Mail list logo
