On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:27:39PM +, Steve Murphy wrote:
Hi Nick.
Got a bit further building from svn-12686.
Throws up a warning about tor_threads_init
Also tried --disable-threads did the same.
Ah, I think I see what this is. In 0.2.0.x, threads are now
mandatory. But threads
Hi Nick.
Yep, --enable-threads builds fine works as a client ok.
Just set it up as a Relay (lar) to see how it goes.
Regards
Steve
Nick Mathewson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 08:27:39PM +, Steve Murphy wrote:
Hi Nick.
Got a bit further building from svn-12686.
Throws up a warning
I've been running the Tor, Torbutton, and Privoxy combo on Mac OS X
for a long time, but when I recently updated to 10.4.11, it stopped
working, even though it's supposed to start up automatically when I
login every day. All I got were error messages saying that Privoxy
was set to a host
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:04:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 0.7K bytes in
15 lines about:
: I've been running the Tor, Torbutton, and Privoxy combo on Mac OS X
: for a long time, but when I recently updated to 10.4.11, it stopped
: working, even though it's supposed to start up
On Dec 8, 2007, at 8:20 AM [ December 8 2007 ], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:04:53AM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote 0.7K bytes in 15 lines about:
: I've been running the Tor, Torbutton, and Privoxy combo on Mac OS X
: for a long time, but when I recently updated to
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 08:04:53AM -0600, Fox Mulder wrote:
Finally I uninstalled it and installed the Tor, Privoxy, and Vidalia
package and it works, but I have to manually turn it on now, since
there are no startup scripts for Tor and Privoxy with that package.
Me too, please. I'm
no problem, I accept yours and others assertions that a home made
magnetic device won't work.
It occurs to me that in any case where even one operator knows or has
possession/knowledge of the keys or backups,
that that information could still be gained through torture/coercion in
rare cases where
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others (friend
of yours maybe?)
And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
they, of course, are doing the censoring.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:30:04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:05:27PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
they, of course, are doing the censoring.
I'm trying to follow the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
OK, i swept back through the postings and /dev/ass wasn't nice too. Got
that, Eugen?
Whatever.
Back to business.
10 matches
Mail list logo
