I wrote:
+ On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:32:23 -0600 Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+wrote:
+>Scott Bennett wrote:
+>> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:15:05 -0600 Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+>> wrote:
+>>
+>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+>>>
+ Another point is that without a tor s
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 22:32:23 -0600 Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Scott Bennett wrote:
>> On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:15:05 -0600 Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>
Another point is that without a tor server my home would be
Scott Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:15:05 -0600 Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another point is that without a tor server my home would be vulnerable to traffic
analysis and a further point is that a tor server is more safe than only a cli
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 14:15:05 -0600 Jon McLachlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Another point is that without a tor server my home would be vulnerable to
>> traffic
>> analysis and a further point is that a tor server is more safe than only a
>> client.
>>
>I thi
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 07:43:06PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Every time the IP changes - or the relay even goes down and up (instead
> > of doing a -SIGHUP) - it breaks all the circuits running through your node.
>
> i've been killing the tor server via torctl stop before my disconnects
Hi,
> Every time the IP changes - or the relay even goes down and up (instead
> of doing a -SIGHUP) - it breaks all the circuits running through your node.
i've been killing the tor server via torctl stop before my disconnects and
restarting
via torctl start (i also restarted squid and privoxy).
Hi,
> | i got only a snail mail with a complaint about much spam, because i
> started with no closed port.
> | Since i closed port 25 i had no complaint since more than a year :-)
> | And with the proxy chaining of port 80 it should be fine for the next
> years.
> (snip)
>
> Odd; the default exit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another point is that without a tor server my home would be vulnerable to traffic
analysis and a further point is that a tor server is more safe than only a client.
I think this depends largely on what type of traffic analysis we're
talking about. Traffic analysis, j
On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:17:13PM +0300, accept no limits wrote:
> Hello everybody,
>
> here an update.
>
> "unsuspended". So I don't know why it was suspended and I don't know why it
> was unsuspended.
>
Nevermind...
> Now the server has new IPs and this exit node will soon be back.
>
> By
Hi,
> (snip)
> | yes, they can't! At least for an exit gateway they receive
> | potentially tons of abuse complaints.
with a transparent proxy +ISP proxy they can get abuse complaints
about their proxy or maybe (with really good http header evaluation)
about my proxy. So the complaints are all ab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
accept no limits schrieb:
> Now the server has new IPs and this exit node will soon be back.
Congratulations!
> Bye
> accept no limits
Alex.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
iQCVAwUBR4OxdRYlVVSQ3uFxAQL7EgQAqQUPYZLGz
Hello everybody,
here an update.
on the 1st of January 2008 the web server provider shinjiru (Malaysia)
kicked my exit node acceptnolimits (traffic about 10 GB per day)
because of "abuse".
Before the contract (serveral months ago) I asked if they have a
problem with tor running on their servers
On Mon, 07 Jan 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> i'm changing my public IP number ten times per day and to avoid confusion,
Don't do that. It takes several hours before all the clients have your
current descriptor, if you keep changing it every two or so hours you
are only placing a burden on the
13 matches
Mail list logo
