On Fri, Mar 7, 2008 at 8:27 PM Roger Dingledine wrote:
I believe [scrubbed] is the actual string that he is seeing.
That's correct.
In this case, I believe those warnings come from people running Tor
clients or relays on 0.2.0.17-alpha, which had a bug in TLS handshaking.
Thanks for the
Good to see some updates on the xb browser. I don't know if it's
appropriate for this discussion and I'm just assuming that you have some
affiliation with xerobank but do you know what the status of the xerobank
project/company is?
On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 5:26 PM, Arrakis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, germany and tor.
I know that there are a lot of tor servers and i know
they are fast and frequently used. But i would never
ever use a german exit node. NEVER!
I for myself have excluded all german and belgium exit
nodes. I am unsure about the german authorities and
their wild activities
Dieter Zinke wrote:
Well, germany and tor.
I know that there are a lot of tor servers and i know
they are fast and frequently used. But i would never
ever use a german exit node. NEVER!
---snip---
Would you use exit-servers from Denmark? We also have data retention,
although not the exact
RTA,
Yes, I have lots of information about the project. What would you like to
to know?
Steve
Rochester TOR Admin wrote:
Good to see some updates on the xb browser. I don't know if it's
appropriate for this discussion and I'm just assuming that you have some
affiliation with xerobank but
Dieter Zinke wrote:
I for myself have excluded all german and belgium exit
nodes.
did you write a script generating your torrc file or how do
you manage to keep track of about 300 .be and .de exit nodes?
just curious
Olaf
Rochester TOR Admin schrieb:
A few other environment factors:
- my firwall is a pretty old machine with a very slow NIC
- my tor server NIC is very cheap [$10]
Could anyone give me some insight about what they think might be going on?
I'm not sure... what's a pretty old machine? I mean,
Oh, and memory might be an issue too. If your machine starts paging and
swapping it'll suffer from it.
at-sar helps there too.
Alex.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Bill Weiss @ 2008/03/06 17:42:
Better Gmail 2 [1] claims to force SSL on all gmail connections. I
haven't tested it to verify that it is correct.
Sorry, no general-case solution, just some help for the Gmail users :)
[1]
9 matches
Mail list logo