Matej Kovacic wrote:
Hi,
this seems an interesting issue:
http://www.making-the-web.com/misc/sites-you-visit/nojs/
bye, Matej
>>>Anon Mus Wrote:
>>> Been to this site and it dont work on my firefox.3.0.8 browser... (with
>>> NoScript, QuickJav
> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2009 22:34:32 +0100
> From: my.green.lant...@googlemail.com
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> Subject: Re: Stealing browser history without JavaScript
> > Matej Kovacic wrote:
> >
> > Seems to me it would have to have all websites known to man on the page it
> > loads. If it loo
Zinco wrote:
-Original Message-
From: owner-or-t...@freehaven.net [mailto:owner-or-t...@freehaven.net] On
Behalf Of Anon Mus
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 8:09 AM
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Stealing browser history without JavaScript
Matej Kovacic wrote:
Hi,
this seems an
Hi Ringo,
Thanks for your soon to be improvements! I have a couple of
requests/questions if you do not mind:
1. I believe the current state of Hidden Service (HS) is one where access to an
HS can be username:passphrase protected? Please correct me if I am wrong, but
I believe someone made H
Alexander Cherepanov wrote:
Hello, Scott!
You wrote to or-t...@seul.org, scr...@nonvocalscream.com on Sun, 14 Jun 2009
01:15:43 -0500 (CDT):
Now, another person on this list has argued that the RFC's should be
ignored and that IANA should be ignored. I remain unconvinced that doing
ei
-Original Message-
From: owner-or-t...@freehaven.net [mailto:owner-or-t...@freehaven.net] On
Behalf Of Anon Mus
Sent: Sunday, June 14, 2009 8:09 AM
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: Stealing browser history without JavaScript
Matej Kovacic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this seems an interesting
Matej Kovacic wrote:
Hi,
this seems an interesting issue:
http://www.making-the-web.com/misc/sites-you-visit/nojs/
bye, Matej
Been to this site and it dont work on my firefox.3.0.8 browser... (with
NoScript, QuickJava, Better Privacy, JavaScript Deobfuscator, Quick
Preference Button & Us
On 06/14/2009 04:52 AM, pigpo...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> It's encouraged to use SSL across tor rather than unencrypted HTTP.
> Most of the websites I view do not offer SSL. How is it possible to
> maintain a persistant SSL experience on the web with tor excluding
> the few sites offering SSL?
You
On 06/14/2009 04:48 AM, pigpo...@safe-mail.net wrote:
> I installed tor v0.2.0.34 from source, Linux. I run tor from
> ~/tor(verion)/src/or, after running ./configure && make, omitting
> make install. It works well. As it starts, one message is:
>
> [notice] Configuration file "/usr/local/etc/tor/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So, did I get this right? You are concerned about certain log messages,
you even searched them on the Net, but you deleted them afterwards
(including the searches in your browser history) and are telling us now
that something strange is going on when v
Hello, Scott!
You wrote to or-t...@seul.org, scr...@nonvocalscream.com on Sun, 14 Jun 2009
01:15:43 -0500 (CDT):
> Now, another person on this list has argued that the RFC's should be
> ignored and that IANA should be ignored. I remain unconvinced that doing
> either would be a good idea.
I explored a few of the common .onion sites listed at Wikipedia's tor page
listed within the external links footer. These sites loaded well, but I noticed
several errors in my tor client logs. I googled for info on the errors, some of
the error messages turned up in cvs related pages and bug tal
I installed tor v0.2.0.34 from source, Linux. I run tor from
~/tor(verion)/src/or, after running ./configure && make, omitting make install.
It works well. As it starts, one message is:
[notice] Configuration file "/usr/local/etc/tor/torrc" not present, using
reasonable defaults.
As I opted no
It's encouraged to use SSL across tor rather than unencrypted HTTP. Most of the
websites I view do not offer SSL. How is it possible to maintain a persistant
SSL experience on the web with tor excluding the few sites offering SSL? I've
discovered some commerical web proxies offering SSL accounts
Thank you. I switched on info-logging and tomorrow I'll post the results
of your script.
Hans de Hartog
Scott Bennett wrote:
Unfortunately, the above method is unlikely to see more than a tiny
fraction of the port 43 exits, which are usually of very short duration.
Instead, try turni
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 05:20:13 -0400 pigpo...@safe-mail.net wrote:
>I installed tor v0.2.0.34 from source, Linux. I run tor from /src/or, after
>running ./configure && make, omitting make install. It works well. As it
>starts, one message is:
>
>[notice] Configuration file "/usr/local/etc/tor/
I explored a few of the common .onion sites listed at Wikipedia's tor page
listed within the external links footer. These sites loaded well, but I noticed
several errors in my tor client logs. I googled for info on the errors, some of
the error messages turned up in cvs related pages and bug tal
It's encouraged to use SSL across tor rather than unencrypted HTTP. Most of the
websites I view do not offer SSL. How is it possible to maintain a persistant
SSL experience on the web with tor excluding the few sites offering SSL? I've
discovered some commerical web proxies offering SSL accounts
I installed tor v0.2.0.34 from source, Linux. I run tor from /src/or, after
running ./configure && make, omitting make install. It works well. As it
starts, one message is:
[notice] Configuration file "/usr/local/etc/tor/torrc" not present, using
reasonable defaults.
As I opted not to run make
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 04:53:51 -0400 pigpo...@safe-mail.net wrote:
>Twice, I've received the, "Sorry, you're not using tor" message on the tor
>check page. I checked one tor node listing website, the exit node IP listed on
>the "Sorry" page was a recently added exit node which had a duplicate
Twice, I've received the, "Sorry, you're not using tor" message on the tor
check page. I checked one tor node listing website, the exit node IP listed on
the "Sorry" page was a recently added exit node which had a duplicate name of
another exit node. This duplicate exit node was listed as down,
On Sun, 14 Jun 2009 09:57:31 +0200 Hans de Hartog
wrote:
>Let's get back to the facts. I ran the following script last night
>every 10 seconds for 10 hours on my exit node (lowest possible
>bandwidth, i.e. 20 KBs).
>Port Connections(cumulative for all runs)
>443 131013
>80 31367
>43
I added quite a few ExitPolicy lines to allow exits to whois servers
I found on a list. Unfortunately, rather than uploading a new descriptor,
tor is now issuing error messages that repeat frequently.
Jun 14 03:03:08.492 [notice] Received reload signal (hup). Reloading config and
resetting
Let's get back to the facts. I ran the following script last night
every 10 seconds for 10 hours on my exit node (lowest possible
bandwidth, i.e. 20 KBs).
Port Connections(cumulative for all runs)
443 131013
80 31367
43 306
Other ports neglectable, so why the fuzz about port 43?
The scri
24 matches
Mail list logo
