ShutdownWaitLength vs. 'restart' in init scripts

2009-06-22 Thread Bill McGonigle
Hi folks, I noticed a problem with the init script I have with the tor package on Fedora 10. The 'restart' command (just a start and stop) sends a -INT to the running process, but doesn't account for ShutdownWaitLength. It looks like the old server instance unbinds, so the new one can start up,

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread Scott Bennett
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 14:40:04 -0700 coderman wrote: >On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: >>...Where would I find that, please? =A0The only pointer I have at present >> for the proposals is.. > >try https://git.torproject.org/checkout/tor/master/doc/spec/proposals/ > Tha

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread tor-opera...@sky-haven.net
Scríobh Martin Fick: But, just for grinns, how would ICANN go about attacking an individual host anyway? Surely they cannot revoke my personal IP, could they? My ISP owns that now, not ICANN, right? For them to revoke the block that my ISP owns, it would be a major time consuming task wouldn'

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread coderman
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:04 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: >...Where would I find that, please?  The only pointer I have at present > for the proposals is.. try https://git.torproject.org/checkout/tor/master/doc/spec/proposals/ best regards,

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread Martin Fick
--- On Mon, 6/22/09, Martin Fick wrote: > > If I understand this correctly, as > > long as ICANN is "owned" by the US, they have the > > ability to shutdown anyone they don't like. > [lost's of talk about ICANN problems being surmountable] ... But, just for grinns, how would ICANN go about atta

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread Scott Bennett
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 12:05:20 -0700 (PDT) Martin Fick wrote: >--- On Mon, 6/22/09, Denis Dimick wrote: >> If I understand this correctly, as >> long as ICANN is "owned" by the US, they have the >> ability to shutdown anyone they don't like. [Note to Denis Dimick : it is not necessary t

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread Martin Fick
--- On Mon, 6/22/09, Denis Dimick wrote: > If I understand this correctly, as > long as ICANN is "owned" by the US, they have the > ability to shutdown anyone they don't like. While this is certainly a threat, it is not as all emcompassing as it sounds. ICANN may control the currently agreed u

Re: jurisdictional concentration of authorities

2009-06-22 Thread Denis Dimick
If I understand this correctly, as long as ICANN is "owned" by the US, they have the ability to shutdown anyone they don't like. While I agree with your idea, I'm not sure there is a way to get around ICANN. Denis -- sik vis paw kem, para bellum --

Re: bad link on download page

2009-06-22 Thread Scott Bennett
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009 08:27:48 -0400 Andrew Lewman wrote: >On 06/21/2009 11:38 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: >> The link for the sha1 digest of the tor-0.2.1.16-rc.tar.gz file on the >> download page at https://www.torproject.org/download.html.en returns a 404 >> Not Found error. > >Oops. Fixe

Re: bad link on download page

2009-06-22 Thread Andrew Lewman
On 06/21/2009 11:38 PM, Scott Bennett wrote: > The link for the sha1 digest of the tor-0.2.1.16-rc.tar.gz file on the > download page at https://www.torproject.org/download.html.en returns a 404 > Not Found error. Oops. Fixed. -- Andrew Lewman The Tor Project pgp 0x31B0974B Website: https