Matej Kovacic wrote:
Well, Zfone is not released under GPL licence. And only development
(test) version of it is free. Final version will be proprietary...
No, but twinkle is GPL and use ZRTP: http://www.twinklephone.com/
And it should work with Zfone.
Unfortunately, majority of SIP provider
Hi,
> You might want to take a look at zfone and zrtp. zfone is a free software
> phone that originates zrtp, an encryption scheme about to be implemented into
> a number of other free softphones (ekiga, for instance).
Well, Zfone is not released under GPL licence. And only development
(test)
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 21:33:33 +0400 James Brown
wrote:
>Praedor Atrebates wrote:
>> On Friday 24 July 2009 10:21:52 am James Brown wrote:
>>
>>> Gitano wrote:
>>>
James Brown wrote:
> There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
> count
Praedor Atrebates wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 10:21:52 am James Brown wrote:
>
>> Gitano wrote:
>>
>>> James Brown wrote:
>>>
There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
counties intend to make this control more and more stronger.
In the R
James Brown wrote:
>> I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
>> application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
>> Software using Tor.
>>
> Is it possible to call from it to ordinary telephones (insluding mobiles)?
Sorry - no, see also: http://ihu.source
Gitano wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>
>
>> And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
>>
>
> I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
> application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
> Software using Tor.
>
>
Is it possible to
On Friday 24 July 2009 10:21:52 am James Brown wrote:
> Gitano wrote:
> > James Brown wrote:
> >> There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
> >> counties intend to make this control more and more stronger.
> >> In the Russia, when I live, for example the Putin's and Medv
James Brown wrote:
> And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
I use 'ihu' as an alternate for skype, but its a peer-to-peer
application and for Linux only. AFAIK there is no SIP-based VoIP
Software using Tor.
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 04:21:52PM CEST, James Brown wrote:
> > --> http://code.google.com/p/torchat/
>
> And what about phone calls, including call to ordinaty telephones?
I supervised a master thesis last year which developed a prototype
for anonymous VoIP using Tor. The results were promising,
Gitano wrote:
> James Brown wrote:
>
>
>> There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
>> counties intend to make this control more and more stronger.
>> In the Russia, when I live, for example the Putin's and Medvedev's
>> bloody dictatorial regim now intend to ban VoIP
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:50:14 Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 07/24/2009 08:44 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
> > Ah ha! A quick look around this openSUSE linux system reveals
> > /etc/rc.d/tor and that accepts the 'stop' option. It tells me that 'tor
> > apparently not running (no pid file)'.
>
> My advice i
James Brown wrote:
> There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
> counties intend to make this control more and more stronger.
> In the Russia, when I live, for example the Putin's and Medvedev's
> bloody dictatorial regim now intend to ban VoIP telephony:
> http://www.p
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:50:14 Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 07/24/2009 08:44 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
> > Ah ha! A quick look around this openSUSE linux system reveals
> > /etc/rc.d/tor and that accepts the 'stop' option. It tells me that 'tor
> > apparently not running (no pid file)'.
>
> My advice i
There is a very strong control over telephony in many countries. Many
counties intend to make this control more and more stronger.
In the Russia, when I live, for example the Putin's and Medvedev's
bloody dictatorial regim now intend to ban VoIP telephony:
http://www.point.ru/news/stories/20598/
B
On 07/23/2009 05:31 PM, sigi wrote:
> Has anyone tested the firefox sage(too)-addons [1] for the use with tor
> yet? Is this (anonymously) safe to use?
In my quick and non-thorough testing, it appears to honor the firefox
proxy configuration and use tor to grab the feeds. ymmv.
--
Andrew Lewm
On 07/24/2009 08:44 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
> Ah ha! A quick look around this openSUSE linux system reveals /etc/rc.d/tor
> and that accepts the 'stop' option. It tells me that 'tor apparently not
> running (no pid file)'.
My advice is to start over with Tor, and not use the rpms that come with
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:16:50 Scott Bennett wrote:
> On UNIX systems, the default signal sent by kill is SIGHUP. Is that
> default signal different on LINUX systems? A SIGHUP will not result in
> tor shutting down unless it discovers an error upon rereading torrc. On
> a UNIX system, "kill -
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:25:55 Christian Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Bob
>
> Williams wrote:
> > On Friday 24 July 2009 13:06:55 Christian Fromme wrote:
> >> Next time you want to kill Tor, check out its process id (`pidof tor`
> >> or `ps ax | grep tor | grep -v grep`
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:24:45 +0200 Christian Fromme
To: Scott Bennett
>On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> On UNIX systems, the default signal sent by kill is SIGHUP. Is that
>> default signal different on LINUX systems?
>
>Not meaning to sound like a professor here
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:18 PM, Bob
Williams wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 13:06:55 Christian Fromme wrote:
>> Next time you want to kill Tor, check out its process id (`pidof tor`
>> or `ps ax | grep tor | grep -v grep`) and kill that explicitly via
>> `kill `. Make sure you're the same us
Hi Scott,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> On UNIX systems, the default signal sent by kill is SIGHUP. Is that
> default signal different on LINUX systems?
Not meaning to sound like a professor here, but the default kill
signal is SIGTERM on systems I have used. YMMV.
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:55:49 Scott Bennett wrote:
> Okay. Next, open a firefox Preferences panel. I haven't decided to
> switch to firefox3 yet, so I don't know whether the procedure is the same,
> but in firefox2 one selects the preferences option from the Edit menu.
> In the Preferences pa
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:06:55 Christian Fromme wrote:
> Next time you want to kill Tor, check out its process id (`pidof tor`
> or `ps ax | grep tor | grep -v grep`) and kill that explicitly via
> `kill `. Make sure you're the same user that started Tor when you
> kill it. Check if its still runn
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:06:55 +0200 Christian Fromme
wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Bob
>Williams wrote:
>> 12:53 barrowhillfarm:~> killall tor
>> 12:53 barrowhillfarm:~> tor -f /etc/tor/torrc
>> Jul 24 12:54:15.469 [notice] Tor v0.2.0.35. This is experimental software. Do
>> not rel
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:06:55 Christian Fromme wrote:
> I guess your Tor is ok. Please follow the instructions provided by others.
>
> Next time you want to kill Tor, check out its process id (`pidof tor`
> or `ps ax | grep tor | grep -v grep`) and kill that explicitly via
> `kill `. Make sure yo
On Friday 24 July 2009 13:03:57 DM wrote:
> Look at the line in the config file containing the Socks listener
> entry and see if you added an extra character after the port number.
>
This is what I have, unaltered from the original sample file:
## Replace this with "SocksPort 0" if you plan to run
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:58 PM, Bob
Williams wrote:
> 12:53 barrowhillfarm:~> killall tor
> 12:53 barrowhillfarm:~> tor -f /etc/tor/torrc
> Jul 24 12:54:15.469 [notice] Tor v0.2.0.35. This is experimental software. Do
> not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on Linux x86_64)
> Jul 24 1
Look at the line in the config file containing the Socks listener
entry and see if you added an extra character after the port number.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 7:58 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:47:41 Christian Fromme wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Bob
Williams
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:47:41 Christian Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Bob
>
> Williams wrote:
> > On Friday 24 July 2009 12:37:50 Christian Fromme wrote:
> >> Can you restart Tor and see if that puts any messages in your logfile?
> >> If not, you seem to have changed so
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:40:39 +0100 Bob Williams
wrote:
>On Friday 24 July 2009 12:26:39 Scott Bennett wrote:
>> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:18:52 +0100 Bob Williams
>>
>> wrote:
>> >On Friday 24 July 2009 12:09:48 Bob Williams wrote:
>> >> On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
>> >> > Go
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Bob
Williams wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 12:37:50 Christian Fromme wrote:
>> Can you restart Tor and see if that puts any messages in your logfile?
>> If not, you seem to have changed some configuration settings in the
>> meantime, breaking it.
>
> Thanks.
Hi
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Why do you think that? What he posted above shows that tor started
> up okay, successfully built a circuit, and has encountered no situation
> since that time that would require logging a notice-level message. What
> is broken about
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:37:50 Christian Fromme wrote:
> Can you restart Tor and see if that puts any messages in your logfile?
> If not, you seem to have changed some configuration settings in the
> meantime, breaking it.
Thanks. How do I restart Tor? I originally started it with
~> tor -f /etc
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 13:37:50 +0200 Christian Fromme
wrote:
>On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Bob
>Williams wrote:
>>> Can you enable logging for Tor and check if you see some errors? Or
>>> see anything at all?
>>>
>> I have the following line uncommented in torrc
>>
>> Log notice file /var/l
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:26:39 Scott Bennett wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:18:52 +0100 Bob Williams
>
> wrote:
> >On Friday 24 July 2009 12:09:48 Bob Williams wrote:
> >> On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
> >> > Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
>
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Bob
Williams wrote:
>> Can you enable logging for Tor and check if you see some errors? Or
>> see anything at all?
>>
> I have the following line uncommented in torrc
>
> Log notice file /var/log/tor/notices.log
>
> and that file contains the following
>
> ---q
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:17:23 Christian Fromme wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Bob
>
> Williams wrote:
> > On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
> >> Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
> >> with your assigned addressed.
> >
> > That shows my
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 12:18:52 +0100 Bob Williams
wrote:
>On Friday 24 July 2009 12:09:48 Bob Williams wrote:
>> On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
>> > Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
>> > with your assigned addressed.
>>
>> That shows my correct WAN
Hi,
On Fri, Jul 24, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Bob
Williams wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
>> Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
>> with your assigned addressed.
>
> That shows my correct WAN IP address, as allocated by my ISP. I presume that
> shows that
On Friday 24 July 2009 12:09:48 Bob Williams wrote:
> On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
> > Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
> > with your assigned addressed.
>
> That shows my correct WAN IP address, as allocated by my ISP. I presume
> that shows that tor
On Friday 24 July 2009 11:58:09 DM wrote:
> Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
> with your assigned addressed.
That shows my correct WAN IP address, as allocated by my ISP. I presume that
shows that tor is not working.
--
Bob
Go to www.whatismyipaddress.com and compare the reported ip address
with your assigned addressed.
On Jul 24, 2009, at 4:17 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
On Friday 24 July 2009 00:03:03 Michael Gomboc wrote:
Have you changed privoxy's config file for use with tor?
I have now (see Andrew Lewman's
On Friday 24 July 2009 00:03:03 Michael Gomboc wrote:
> Have you changed privoxy's config file for use with tor?
I have now (see Andrew Lewman's post and my reply).
I have added the following two lines to my privoxy config
forward-socks4a / 127.0.0.1:9050 .
forward-socks5 / 127.0.0
On Friday 24 July 2009 01:20:30 Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 07/23/2009 06:36 PM, Bob Williams wrote:
> > 18:58 user:~> privoxy /etc/privoxy/config
> > Jul 23 20:29:33.391 Privoxy(7fb481fa96f0) Info: Privoxy version 3.0.10
> > Jul 23 20:29:33.391 Privoxy(7fb481fa96f0) Info: Program name: privoxy
> > J
44 matches
Mail list logo
