On Friday 21 August 2009 23:07:22 downie - wrote:
On 08/21/2009 10:52 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
I have both privoxy and torbutton installed. When I setup Firefox's
proxy settings to use http and ssl through 127.0.0.1 port 8118 and
SOCKS host 127.0.0.1 port 9050, torbutton enables
On Friday 21 August 2009 22:59:01 Freemor wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 22:33:07 +0100
Bob Williams secur...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk wrote:
At this point, http://config.privoxy.org/ shows me I'm that privoxy
is enabled, but if I then disable torbutton, I also lose my privoxy
settings, and it
I'm using the Tor+Firofox browser bundle downloaded at torproject.org. I setup
a virtual Windows XP machine under my normal OS (using VMWare) and I'm doing
all my private browsing under that machine.
I need to use an rss reader, but can't use a web based one (like google reader)
since I have
From: secur...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk
To: or-t...@seul.org
Subject: Re: Annoying loop situation
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:46:57 +0100
On Friday 21 August 2009 23:07:22 downie - wrote:
On 08/21/2009 10:52 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
I have both privoxy and torbutton installed. When I
On Saturday 22 August 2009 10:33:01 downie - wrote:
From: secur...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk
To: or-t...@seul.org
Subject: Re: Annoying loop situation
Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:46:57 +0100
On Friday 21 August 2009 23:07:22 downie - wrote:
On 08/21/2009 10:52 AM, Bob Williams wrote:
On Fri, Aug 21, 2009 at 10:29:37PM -0400, Ringo wrote:
This rule will go right at the top of the iptables rules (-I = Insert),
and it ACCEPTS every packet that enter through your lo (loopback)
network interface, which is used for internal communications.
Unfortunately, this is a little too
On Sat, 22 Aug 2009 12:27:22 +0100 Bob Williams
secur...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk wrote:
On Saturday 22 August 2009 10:33:01 downie - wrote:
From: secur...@barrowhillfarm.org.uk
[superfluous headers deleted --SB]
On Friday 21 August 2009 23:07:22 downie - wrote:
On 08/21/2009 10:52
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 05:16, Sadece Gercekler ina...@ymail.com wrote:
I'm using the Tor+Firofox browser bundle downloaded at torproject.org. I
setup a virtual Windows XP machine under my normal OS (using VMWare) and I'm
doing all my private browsing under that machine.
I need to use an rss
Bob Williams wrote:
The uncommented lines in my privoxy config file are:
forward 192.168.*.*/ .
forward-socks4a / 127.0.0.1:9050 .
forward-socks5/ 127.0.0.1:9050 .
To use privoxy without Tor you can add the following line BELOW the
You may want to look at JanusVM or Tor VM. Instead think about re-directing
everything to use Tor. These solutions do that, and work with any
application.
http://www.janusvm.com/http://www.janusvm.com/tor_vm/
https://www.torproject.org/torvm/index.html.en
- Kyle
On Sat, Aug 22, 2009 at 2:16
Hi Andrew!
On Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:22:00 -0400, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote:
Sorry my ignorance but why caching proxy is better than built-in
Firefox cache?
Enabling torbutton disables firefox cache. I didn't test non-tor
firefox caching.
Thinking about this some more,
On Saturday 22 August 2009 14:59:15 Gitano wrote:
Bob Williams wrote:
The uncommented lines in my privoxy config file are:
forward 192.168.*.*/ .
forward-socks4a / 127.0.0.1:9050 .
forward-socks5 / 127.0.0.1:9050 .
To use privoxy without Tor you
Bob Williams wrote:
To use privoxy without Tor you can add the following line BELOW the
'forward-socks*' lines:
forward/.
Last match wins, see also:
http://www.privoxy.org/user-manual/config.html#FORWARDING
The effect of this would be the same as NOT having the forward-socks*
Oh man I'm getting headaches, this should not be that complex. Here's
what I want it to do.
1. Block the user torify from accessing anything except port 9050 and
8118 on localhost. No external connections allowed and no other internal
connections allowed.
2. Allow all other users to connect
14 matches
Mail list logo
