Bad News..
The hosting provider is still getting take down notices etc and sent me an
email wanting to know what other preemptive actions I have taken or can take
to prevent anymore notices from coming in.
Supposedly the DC is threatening to pull the plug on their server if they
don't do something
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 23:56, Eric ['Sky-san!'] Jia Bigham
han...@xsmail.com wrote:
Using Vidalia 0.2.6 (PPC) under Mac OS 10.5.8 - when trying to create/use a
bridge, I get this strange error message that reads:
Dec 26 13:53:21.352 [Warning] Failed to open GEOIP file
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:26:05 -0500 Mike L jackoro...@gmail.com
top-posted:
Bad News..
The hosting provider is still getting take down notices etc and sent me an
email wanting to know what other preemptive actions I have taken or can take
to prevent anymore notices from coming in.
Supposedly
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
why is this?
thank you very much
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:26, arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
Traffic within TOR itself is encrypted as part of the anonimization:
When you are in the cloud, it is almost impossible to make heads or
tails out of the messages that are
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 12:48 +0100, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:26, arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
Traffic within TOR itself is encrypted as part of the anonimization:
When you are in the cloud, it is almost
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy has the ability to deanimate gifs. Check your Privoxy
Scott Bennett wrote:
The key here is that the ISPs not only cannot detect encrypted URLs,
they cannot detect what the user is doing, not even whether the user is
trying to connect to a port or is simply transmitting packets over an already
open connection or is closing a connection. They
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 04:50 -0700, Jim wrote:
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 04:50 -0700, Jim wrote:
arshad wrote:
hi all,
what is the difference in using privoxy and polipo?
im in ubuntu and have used both. and privoxy seems unable to render
all .gifs file. it shows part of the gif or in some cases won't show the
animation.
Privoxy
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 17:24 +0530, arshad wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 12:48 +0100, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 12:26, arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
Traffic within TOR itself is encrypted as part of the
arshad wrote:
but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
place in config file to do that :(
The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
You can append these two lines:
{-deanimate-gifs}
/ # Match all URLs
hi all,
why tor nodes most of the time based on us,germany and korea?
why not other countries like india, spain, italy, brazil etc...
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 14:06 +0100, Gitano wrote:
arshad wrote:
but now i want to disable that deanaimate gif thing. but there isn't a
place in config file to do that :(
The place for personal configuration in privoxy is 'user.action'.
You can append these two lines:
{-deanimate-gifs}
average for a usual traffic?...
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
arshad wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 05:03:22 -0700 Jim jimmy...@copper.net wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote:
The key here is that the ISPs not only cannot detect encrypted URLs,
they cannot detect what the user is doing, not even whether the user is
trying to connect to a port or is simply transmitting
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 09:58 -0500, basile wrote:
arshad wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:47:49 +0530 arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 09:58 -0500, basile wrote:
arshad wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
thanks.
***
To
On 12/27/2009 12:59 AM, Seth David Schoen wrote:
Scott Bennett writes:
On the contrary, in the United States, all ISPs are *required* by
statute to record all URL requests that can be detected passing from their
customers through their equipment.
What statute requires this?
USA
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 09:27 -0600, Scott Bennett wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 20:47:49 +0530 arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 09:58 -0500, basile wrote:
arshad wrote:
i want the traffic be encrypted as well?
any workarounds?
thanks.
basile wrote:
If you repeat the above, but go to https://www.google.com (note the
http+s), then the above changes in that the clear http is replaced by
encrypted https. Then even the tor exit node admin can't see your traffic.
It depends on the location of the exit node. I saw changing the
3. And please, please, please, read the FAQ:
https://www.torproject.org/faq#Torisdifferent
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 16:05, arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
average for a usual traffic?...
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 19:24 +0100, Nils Vogels wrote:
3. And please, please, please, read the FAQ:
https://www.torproject.org/faq#Torisdifferent
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 16:05, arshad arsha...@gmail.com wrote:
average for a usual traffic?...
thanks.
On 12/27/2009 7:28 AM, arshad wrote:
hi all,
why tor nodes most of the time based on us,germany and korea?
why not other countries like india, spain, italy, brazil etc...
thanks.
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 12:34 -0600, Programmer In Training wrote:
On 12/27/2009 7:28 AM, arshad wrote:
hi all,
why tor nodes most of the time based on us,germany and korea?
why not other countries like india, spain, italy, brazil etc...
thanks.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 19:34, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
It's all in the
documentation. I'm not responding to any more of your queries until you
read all the docs.
While you are at it, please also consider the archives of this list,
you will find that you are
On Sun, 2009-12-27 at 19:49 +0100, Nils Vogels wrote:
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 19:34, Programmer In Training
p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote:
It's all in the
documentation. I'm not responding to any more of your queries until you
read all the docs.
While you are at it, please also
hi,
in a few minutes Roger is speaking at the 26C3 in Berlin. Live wmv
stream is avail here http://streaming-26c3-wmv.fem-net.de/saal2
or other formats here http://events.ccc.de/congress/2009/wiki/Streaming
Olaf
***
To
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:24 AM, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu wrote:
On Sun, 27 Dec 2009 04:26:05 -0500 Mike L jackoro...@gmail.com
top-posted:
Bad News..
The hosting provider is still getting take down notices etc and sent me an
email wanting to know what other preemptive actions I
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 10:59:53PM -0800, sch...@eff.org wrote 0.7K bytes in 16
lines about:
: On the contrary, in the United States, all ISPs are *required* by
: statute to record all URL requests that can be detected passing from their
: customers through their equipment.
:
: What
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 06:58:37PM +0530, arsha...@gmail.com wrote 0.3K bytes
in 9 lines about:
: why tor nodes most of the time based on us,germany and korea?
: why not other countries like india, spain, italy, brazil etc...
Because bandwidth is cheap and plentiful in the first three countries.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 08:47:49PM +0530, arsha...@gmail.com wrote 4.4K bytes
in 132 lines about:
: 1) is no one able to decrypt the tor's encryption?
Not that we know of. Tor uses ephemeral keys for all encryption
exchanges. If your adversary can crack the rsa encryption in under 10
minutes,
On Sat, Dec 26, 2009 at 04:56:44PM -0600, han...@xsmail.com wrote 1.1K bytes in
26 lines about:
Using Vidalia 0.2.6 (PPC) under Mac OS 10.5.8 - when trying to create/
use a bridge, I get this strange error message that reads:
Dec 26 13:53:21.352 [Warning] Failed to open GEOIP file
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:19:35PM -0600, p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote 2.1K
bytes in 48 lines about:
: feeds are polled (the new topics are displayed but not readable). I get
: an error saying that Tor is not an HTTP transport proxy or some such (I
Right, Tor is a socks proxy, not an http
On 12/27/2009 8:59 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:19:35PM -0600, p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote 2.1K
bytes in 48 lines about:
: feeds are polled (the new topics are displayed but not readable). I get
: an error saying that Tor is not an HTTP transport proxy or
On 12/27/2009 8:59 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 11:19:35PM -0600, p...@joseph-a-nagy-jr.us wrote 2.1K
bytes in 48 lines about:
: feeds are polled (the new topics are displayed but not readable). I get
: an error saying that Tor is not an HTTP transport proxy or
On 12/27/2009 10:39 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
OK, now I'm confused. You say don't use :9050, but all your
documentation for FF, TB, and even Pidgin says use :9050
Has this changed and the wiki just not updated to reflect this?
Yes, you are confused. Let me try to clarify.
Leave
On 12/27/2009 10:00 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On 12/27/2009 10:39 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
OK, now I'm confused. You say don't use :9050, but all your
documentation for FF, TB, and even Pidgin says use :9050
Has this changed and the wiki just not updated to reflect this?
Yes, you
On 12/27/2009 10:00 PM, Andrew Lewman wrote:
On 12/27/2009 10:39 PM, Programmer In Training wrote:
OK, now I'm confused. You say don't use :9050, but all your
documentation for FF, TB, and even Pidgin says use :9050
Has this changed and the wiki just not updated to reflect this?
Yes, you
Andrew,
It should be (?)... 0.2.6 released 02 Nov 2009 - downloaded disk image
name vidalia-bundle-0.2.1.21-0.2.6-ppc.dmg. It seems like it points
to a directory and file within the Vidalia package which doesn't exist
(similar to Ticket #535 on the Vidalia TracReports website???). The
42 matches
Mail list logo
