Mike Perry wrote:
> Thus spake Erik de Castro Lopo (mle+to...@mega-nerd.com):
>
> >
> > http://duckduckgo.com/";
> > to="https://duckduckgo.com"/>
> >
> >
> >
> > http://startpage.com/";
> > to="https://startpage.com"/>
> >
>
> Added. I hope these have
On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:55:19 -0700 Seth David Schoen
wrote:
>Scott Bennett writes:
>
>> What seems to be missing from this discussion is the fact that NoScript
>> already supports forcing HTTPS on a site-by-site or pattern basis. You
>> should be using NoScript already if you use Firefo
Thus spake Erik de Castro Lopo (mle+to...@mega-nerd.com):
> Mike Perry wrote:
>
> > In the meantime, we'll gladly accept submissions as xml files for
> > inclusion in the extension itself.
>
> DuckDuckGo and Startpage.com are two alternative (specifically to google)
> search engines which promis
Thus spake Runa A. Sandvik (runa.sand...@gmail.com):
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> > The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
> > can submit and exchange rule files and eventually create subscriptions
> > for the sites they use that partially
On Fri, 28 May 2010 12:22:00 -0700
"a. smith" wrote:
> I have been using the Tor Browser Bundle on a usb pen drive on
> Windows. Will any traces of my data be saved on the host computer or
> on the pen drive?
Yes and yes. The host computer traces are documented at
https://svn.torproject.org/svn
Scott Bennett writes:
> What seems to be missing from this discussion is the fact that NoScript
> already supports forcing HTTPS on a site-by-site or pattern basis. You
> should be using NoScript already if you use Firefox, so just tell it what
> to do.
There's one piece of additional funct
and...@torproject.org writes:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:01PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 1.7K
> bytes in 51 lines about:
> : The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
> : can submit and exchange rule files and eventually create subscriptions
> : for the si
I have been using the Tor Browser Bundle on a usb pen drive on Windows.
Will any traces of my data be saved on the host computer or on the pen
drive?
Hi Andrew,
My advice is that if you are trying to attract non-technical people to
donate money in order to create more relays, your index page needs to be
far less technical.
Yes, you're right. I'm not exactly the best person to do this (not a
native speaker), but I've revised the index page
Hi,
after reading the new developments concerning the chinese GFW, I wonder
what technically interested people or even people with server
capabilities could do, to help fight censorship (besides running a TOR
relay/node/exit/hidden service or some webproxy).
Are there other services/systems someon
Bad news,i can't connect tor now.I get a http proxy and it can be used at
IE.But my tor can't use it, this is the log:
28 23:33:19.187 [Notice] Tor v0.2.1.26. This is experimental software. Do
not rely on it for strong anonymity. (Running on Windows XP Service Pack 3
[workstation] {terminal servic
On Fri, 28 May 2010 15:19:25 +0300 What you get is Not what you see
wrote:
>On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Stephen Carpenter wrot=
>e:
>> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:47 AM, =A0 wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:01PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 1.7=
>K bytes in 51 lines about:
>>
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 08:09:22AM -0400, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:47 AM, wrote:
> > On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:01PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 1.7K
> > bytes in 51 lines about:
> > : The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
> >
On 28.05.2010 06:22, Erik de Castro Lopo wrote:
> DuckDuckGo and Startpage.com are two alternative (specifically to google)
> search engines which promise not to record your IP address :
My favorite since many years is: https://ssl.scroogle.org/ (over Tor)
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:09 PM, Stephen Carpenter wrote:
> On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:47 AM, wrote:
>> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:01PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 1.7K
>> bytes in 51 lines about:
>> : The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
>> : can submi
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 7:47 AM, wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:01PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 1.7K
> bytes in 51 lines about:
> : The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
> : can submit and exchange rule files and eventually create subscriptions
> :
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 4:34 AM, Mike Perry wrote:
> The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
> can submit and exchange rule files and eventually create subscriptions
> for the sites they use that partially support SSL.
Have you seen https://crypto.stanford.edu/force
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 07:34:01PM -0700, mikepe...@fscked.org wrote 1.7K bytes
in 51 lines about:
: The eventual idea is to allow an Adblock Plus style model, where users
: can submit and exchange rule files and eventually create subscriptions
: for the sites they use that partially support SSL.
Op Vr, 28 mei, 2010 04:34, schreef Mike Perry:
> Peter Eckersley of the EFF and I wrote this addon this past week
> to make it easier to use Google's SSL search feature, among other
> mixed-mode SSL sites:
>
> https://www.eff.org/https-everywhere/
This is very awesome. I was actually attempting to
19 matches
Mail list logo
