Re: 3 Hops

2010-11-17 Thread zzzjethro666
Now, what about exiting Hidden Services and then exiting the internet connection? Are those in 3's and is there way to exit the internet that is safe and a way that isn't recommended? Always wondered about that. Once backing out of the Tor network, what is revealed? Is my real IP address

Re: IPTables transparent configuration

2010-11-17 Thread alpal.mailingl...@gmail.com
Curt, I will try and spur some discussion :) I'm not also sure that forcing connections to the tor port will work. Take for example an http request... you are now forcing that to a tor port, which wants to talk socks right? I would have thought you would need some sort of transparent http

Re: IPTables transparent configuration

2010-11-17 Thread Curt Shaffer
Thanks for the input Al. I actually got this to work a little bit after posting this. That always seems to be the case :). For the list and anyone else who may want to do this, I'm posting my iptables config here. sudo iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE sudo iptables -A

Re: Tor 0.2.1.26-1~~lenny+1: segfault with libcryto.so.0.9.8

2010-11-17 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Paul Menzel paulepan...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Dear Tor folks, I noticed that Tor had crashed on my system. I am using Debian Lenny with Tor 0.2.1.26-1~~lenny+1. The only thing I could find out about this crash is the following line running `dmesg`.  

Re: Tor 0.2.1.26-1~~lenny+1: segfault with libcryto.so.0.9.8

2010-11-17 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:45:32AM -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote: I noticed that Tor had crashed on my system. I am using Debian Lenny with Tor 0.2.1.26-1~~lenny+1. The only thing I could find out about this crash is the following line running `dmesg`. Without more information, there's not

Re: IPTables transparent configuration

2010-11-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, Curt Shaffer wrote (17 Nov 2010 12:53:27 GMT) : sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p tcp -s 172.16.10.0/24 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.23:9040 sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING -p icmp -s 172.16.10.0/24 -j DNAT --to-destination 10.0.0.23:9040 sudo iptables -t nat -A PREROUTING

Re: IPTables transparent configuration

2010-11-17 Thread intrigeri
Hi, alpal.mailingl...@gmail.com wrote (17 Nov 2010 09:31:21 GMT) : I'm not also sure that forcing connections to the tor port will work. Take for example an http request... you are now forcing that to a tor port, which wants to talk socks right? He seems to be trying to redirect such a

Re: IPTables transparent configuration

2010-11-17 Thread Curt Shaffer
I was looking to send all traffic through Tor. The UDP rule was taken off of the Tor Transparent Configuration documentation. I have Tor DNSPorts and DNSListenAddress set. I realize this was for DNS requests, but I was kinda hoping to pipe everything through. I will look at just dropping all

Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Roger Dingledine
Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha fixes several crash bugs that have been nagging us lately, makes unpublished bridge relays able to detect their IP address, and fixes a wide variety of other bugs to get us much closer to a stable release. https://www.torproject.org/download/download Packages will be appearing

P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]

2010-11-17 Thread grarpamp
It's my understanding that BitTorrent is less of a bandwidth hog as it is a connections/circuits hog. These are expensive to create and you can't balance your BitTorrenting by hosting a high-bandwidth node because to have 0 net effect on the network, you'd have to host a circuit's worth of

Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread coderman
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 3:02 PM, grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: ... So long as users are covering their bandwidth with giveback [1], I think it's safe to assume the rest of their overhead is also covered by the addition of that node to the network. there's always a catch. ;) ... [1]

Re: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Geoff Down
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:05 -0500, Roger Dingledine a...@mit.edu wrote: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha fixes several crash bugs that have been nagging us lately, makes unpublished bridge relays able to detect their IP address, and fixes a wide variety of other bugs to get us much closer to a stable

Re: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Justin Aplin
On Nov 17, 2010, at 7:38 PM, Geoff Down wrote: Is there a more recent version than 0.2.2.15-alpha available to test? GD I'm interested in this as well, as issues with (read: nasty emails from) one of the net admins at my local ISP have reduced me to running only my Orlando-based PPC

Re: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: If by Tor-only packages you mean the old expert packages, we decided to drop support for them: For background, see https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1274 Sounds like we should do a better job of declaring a policy

Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread grarpamp
So long as users are covering their bandwidth with giveback [1], I ... - indeed provided back to the network as a 'moral' condition by those same users. ... case) you need to give back at least 6x your use. So you will already there's always a catch. ;) Heh, yeah, no one ever suggested this

Re: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Justin Aplin
On Nov 17, 2010, at 7:55 PM, Roger Dingledine wrote: On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 07:50:05PM -0500, Roger Dingledine wrote: If by Tor-only packages you mean the old expert packages, we decided to drop support for them: For background, see https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/1274

Re: Tor 0.2.2.18-alpha is out

2010-11-17 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:11:44 -0500 Justin Aplin jmap...@ufl.edu wrote: I agree that dropping the expert packages might be a good idea, but I don't see a reason that the Vidalia bundles should fall behind. The reason for the delay in packages is the powerpc build machine died a melting death

Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Wed, 17 Nov 2010 20:03:58 -0500 grarpamp grarp...@gmail.com wrote: Wish the mbox or maildir archives were available/mirrored for easy search, reading, reference and reply using native mail clients :) ...I wish people would stop cross-posting between -dev and -talk...;) -- Andrew pgp

Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread coderman
On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Andrew Lewman and...@torproject.org wrote: ...I wish people would stop cross-posting between -dev and -talk...;) mea culpa; i shall curb my reply-all enthusiasm! grarpamp: i'll follow this up with links for various UDP Tor papers and discussions. i've got a

Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread grarpamp
Wish the mbox or maildir archives were available/mirrored for easy search, reading, reference and reply using native mail clients :) ...I wish people would stop cross-posting between -dev and -talk...;) Hey, I might just be inclined to trade detailed examination and separation of message

Re: Scalability and fairness [was: P2P over Tor [was: Anomos - anonBT]]

2010-11-17 Thread grarpamp
grarpamp: i'll follow this up with links for various UDP Tor papers and discussions. i've got a bunch of bookmarks somewhere... You don't have to or anything like that, or maybe for the wiki. I still need to check out the project site and AnonBib more and will probably scrape the web archives

How to install Tor on iPod touch 4th gen. w/ iOS 4.1?

2010-11-17 Thread Moses
Hi, I would like to install Tor on my iPod touch 4th gen. with iOS 4.1. The iPod touch has been jailbreaked with limera1n. After googled on the web for a while, I found this instruction [0]. but the install package download link [1] seems is broken now. So is there anyone has a alternative