I was contacted by the operator of oompaloompa. He has changed the
exit policy of his two nodes to the "Reduced" policy:
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=775df6b8cf3fb0150a594f6e2b5cb1e0ac45d09b
http://torstatus.blutmagie.de/router_detail.php?FP=babbf0694251e5aff7bf3a0a02efdc12cb9
On Tuesday 15 February 2011 05:20:21 Mike Perry wrote:
>
> I was under the impression that we hacked it to also be memory-only,
> though. But you're right, if I toggle Torbutton to clear my cache,
> Polipo's is still there...
The polipo shipped in the tor bundles has the cache turned off, but any
On Monday 14 February 2011 18:11:42 Dave U. Random wrote:
> SHUT UP EELBASH!
I'm not eelbash, nor do I know who eelbash is (I've heard rumors that eelbash
is wormcast, but I don't remember what that was about, it was years ago).
On 2/15/2011 5:00 AM, morphium wrote:
2011/2/14 Julie C:
If this BadExit policy is being
made up ad-hoc, that's fine by me. If the offending Tor node operators want
to stand up and defend themselves, or their choices, that's fine too.
So, I as a Tor Node Operator now have to defend myself, beca
2011/2/15 Mike Perry :
> I think you've become a troll. Sorry 'bout it, man.
I think you just noticed in the mirror, how irrational your decision
to BadExit gatereloaded et al. was.
Thank you!
morphium
***
To unsubscribe, send an
Thus spake morphium (morph...@morphium.info):
> 2011/2/15 Mike Perry :
> >> please BadExit the following nodes (for the same reason you badexit'ed
> >> gatereloaded et al. - no valid contact info, they didn't explain their
> >> exit policy to us, I suspect they are sniffing unencrypted Exit
> >> t
2011/2/15 Mike Perry :
> Thus spake morphium (morph...@morphium.info):
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> please BadExit the following nodes (for the same reason you badexit'ed
>> gatereloaded et al. - no valid contact info, they didn't explain their
>> exit policy to us, I suspect they are sniffing unencrypted Exit
>
With the latest TOR version and the increased in nodes, with the new
balancing in the new version, does it mean that it would be possible
that the volume load would have been decrease from what it was on some
of the nodes?
Maybe a better explanation I am trying to ask is before the updated
version
Thus spake morphium (morph...@morphium.info):
> Hi,
>
> please BadExit the following nodes (for the same reason you badexit'ed
> gatereloaded et al. - no valid contact info, they didn't explain their
> exit policy to us, I suspect they are sniffing unencrypted Exit
> traffic):
>
> TORy0 - 753e0b
Hi,
please BadExit the following nodes (for the same reason you badexit'ed
gatereloaded et al. - no valid contact info, they didn't explain their
exit policy to us, I suspect they are sniffing unencrypted Exit
traffic):
TORy0 - 753e0b5922e34bf98f0d21cc08ea7d1adeee2f6b
TORy2 - f08f537d245a65d9c242
2011/2/14 Julie C :
> If this BadExit policy is being
> made up ad-hoc, that's fine by me. If the offending Tor node operators want
> to stand up and defend themselves, or their choices, that's fine too.
So, I as a Tor Node Operator now have to defend myself, because it's a
priviledge to run a Tor
11 matches
Mail list logo
