Re: Is gatereloaded a Bad Exit?

2011-02-15 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Monday 14 February 2011 18:11:42 Dave U. Random wrote: SHUT UP EELBASH! I'm not eelbash, nor do I know who eelbash is (I've heard rumors that eelbash is wormcast, but I don't remember what that was about, it was years ago).

Re: Is gatereloaded a Bad Exit?

2011-02-14 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Monday 14 February 2011 14:17:45 Aplin, Justin M wrote: However, I see no reason why providing an anonymous contact email would be so hard. Certainly if you're going out of your way to avoid [insert conspiracy of choice] in order to run a node, you have the skills to use one of the hundreds

Re: advice on using accounting...

2011-02-10 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Thursday 10 February 2011 21:02:15 Aplin, Justin M wrote: I've been meaning to ask about this for awhile. Is it more helpful to the network to have (using this example) a node running at 100KB/s for 12 h/d, or limit it to 50KB/s and have it run 24/7? At what point does speed outweigh uptime

Re: What are email risks?

2011-02-07 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Monday 07 February 2011 04:41:06 t...@lists.grepular.com wrote: The major part of my full time job is as an email administrator. Scrubbing headers will affect deliverability to some systems. Probably not as much as having a Tor exit node IP in your Received headers though. Smarthosting

Re: [scrubbed].onion and log level

2011-02-04 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Thursday 03 February 2011 23:43:33 Robert Ransom wrote: Add: SafeLogging 0 to your torrc. Thanks! *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body.

Re: IP address blocked on certain site

2011-02-04 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Friday 04 February 2011 13:38:14 Joe Btfsplk wrote: No ideas yet on what automated software that doesn't follow /robots.txt is forbidden, means? robots.txt is a file put on some websites as a directive to robots. If you run a wiki, and you want only current versions, not the hundreds of

Re: IP address blocked on certain site

2011-02-04 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Friday 04 February 2011 16:10:13 Joe Btfsplk wrote: So how does that relate to Tor? Do sites using this see Tor as a robot? I didn't even get on the site. Plus, there're no files to d/l from it - at least not from an avg users capability. Probably the web server saw so many accesses from

[scrubbed].onion and log level

2011-02-03 Thread cmeclax-sazri
I have a friend here and we're trying to debug a TorChat connection. We had it working once, then I'm trying to talk him through editing his config. He doesn't show up on my TorChat, and I show up as a blue ball on his. So I looked at the log file to see what's happening. It says Tried for 120

Proposal for making Tor TLS stand out less

2011-02-01 Thread cmeclax-sazri
Currently Tor traffic is sent in packets of 512 bytes (which setevents bw shows as 586), which makes it easy to recognize even though it's all TLS encrypted. I propose implementing the following on each connection from one Tor node to another: 1. Allocate a 2048-byte buffer. 2. When the relay

Re: Proposal for making Tor TLS stand out less

2011-02-01 Thread cmeclax-sazri
On Tuesday 01 February 2011 13:18:28 Andrew Lewman wrote: There is a fine thread on or-dev about this, starting here, http://archives.seul.org/or/dev/Jan-2011/msg00029.html All that is about making the handshake not stand out, by using TLS certificates and cryptographic primes more typical of

Privoxy icon popping up

2011-01-31 Thread cmeclax-sazri
I have Konqueror 3.5.8 set up to use Privoxy and Tor. Sometimes I try to bring up a site that's down, and I get a page generated by Privoxy. But I also get Privoxy's favicon on some, but not all, pages of a forum I'm on. How come?