Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> anonymizer2:~# hugeadm --pool-list >> Size Minimum Current Maximum Default >> 2097152 100 319 1000* >> >> PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEMTIME+ P COMMAND >> 21716 debian-t 20 0 2075m 1.1g 25m R 95.2 29.4 2020:29

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 14:42:26 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> Olaf, if you're awake and on-line at/near this hour:-), how about >> an update, now that blutmagie has been running long enough to complete >> its climb to FL510 and accelerate to its cruising speed? Also,

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

Scott Bennett wrote: > > Olaf, if you're awake and on-line at/near this hour:-), how about > an update, now that blutmagie has been running long enough to complete > its climb to FL510 and accelerate to its cruising speed? Also, how about > some numbers for how it ran without libhugetlbfs, ev

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:23:35 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: > >>> >>> It appears memory consumption with the wrapped Linux malloc() is still >>> larger than than with openbsd-malloc I used before. Hugepages don't >>> appear to work with openbsd-malloc. >>> >> Okay, that lo

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 17:23:35 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: > >>> >>> It appears memory consumption with the wrapped Linux malloc() is still >>> larger than than with openbsd-malloc I used before. Hugepages don't >>> appear to work with openbsd-malloc. >>> >> Okay, that lo

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

Scott Bennett wrote: >> >> It appears memory consumption with the wrapped Linux malloc() is still >> larger than than with openbsd-malloc I used before. Hugepages don't >> appear to work with openbsd-malloc. >> > Okay, that looks like a problem, and it probably ought to be passed > along to t

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

On Wed, 14 Apr 2010 15:00:52 +0200 Olaf Selke wrote: >Christian Kujau wrote: >> On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 05:58, Scott Bennett wrote: >>> and straighten us out. Remember that Olaf runs the highest-load-bearing >>> tor node in our whole network, and there are at least two or four dozen >>> other

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 18:18:02 -0700 (PDT) Christian Kujau wrote: >On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 05:58, Scott Bennett wrote: >> and straighten us out. Remember that Olaf runs the highest-load-bearing >> tor node in our whole network, and there are at least two or four dozen >> others that should be c

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 05:58, Scott Bennett wrote: >> and straighten us out. Remember that Olaf runs the highest-load-bearing >> tor node in our whole network, and there are at least two or four dozen >> others that should be considered heavyweight relays that are also on

Re: [or-talk] Re: huge pages, was where are the exit nodes gone?

On Tue, 13 Apr 2010 at 05:58, Scott Bennett wrote: > and straighten us out. Remember that Olaf runs the highest-load-bearing > tor node in our whole network, and there are at least two or four dozen > others that should be considered heavyweight relays that are also on LINUX > systems. ...and som