Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
Please get back to us in a week or so with info on your abuse
complaint rate with the new policy. I'll update
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment
with the policy if it does in fact drastically reduce your
Hi Mike,
Ok, I've updated
https://blog.torproject.org/blog/tips-running-exit-node-minimal-harassment
with this information. Let me know if there is anything else you think
might be helpful, too.
Thanks. Will do.
A blog would be great. Another option besides publishing the actual
complaints
I also allow 465 and 563. Those are used by authenticated SMTPS and
NNTPS.
Thanks. I have added them to the exit policy.
Please get back to us in a week or so with info on your abuse
complaint rate with the new policy. I'll update
On Sun, 2010-06-27 at 19:36 -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
(Though I suspect the SWIP will also help greatly. I am beginning to
believe that these abuse-bot companies deliberately pick on new
hosters who do not have their own IP allocation specified to bully
them off the net).
As in, MediaSentry
As in, MediaSentry doesn't want Tor to exist (for obvious reasons), so
it DMCA-DoS's new exit nodes?
No, they pick on everyone pretty much equally .. easy to do when you're
just using a script to scrape a tracker and complain.
I've investigated many of the complaints over the years, and
Hi,
On 27.06.2010 04:17, Mondior Folimun wrote:
I also allow 465 and 563. Those are used by authenticated SMTPS and
NNTPS.
There's also the chat ports: 1863 (MSN), 5190 (aim), 5050 (yahoo), 5222-
5223 (xmpp/gchat). Those haven't given me any problems either.
Thanks. I have added them to the
Mondior Folimun(mfoli...@elitemail.org)@Sun, Jun 27, 2010 at 04:17:15AM +0200:
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:49 +0200, Moritz Bartl t...@wiredwings.com
wrote:
Hi,
Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we
want to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
On 27.06.2010 04:17, Mondior Folimun wrote:
I also allow 465 and 563. Those are used by authenticated SMTPS and
NNTPS.
There's also the chat ports: 1863 (MSN), 5190 (aim), 5050 (yahoo), 5222-
5223 (xmpp/gchat). Those haven't given me any
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
BayTSP/MediaSentry/etc have heard all the
excuses, including when they tagged my printer as serving up movies;
they don't care. I fully expect they don't even read the responses, just
check that a response was received. The response is
Hi,
On 27.06.2010 03:00, Mike Perry wrote:
Can you post a copy of your counter-notification? Did they say in
specific why they believe it doesn't meet the requirements?
Also, are you familiar with chillingeffects? They catalog DMCA-related
correspondence and provide some legal FAQs for
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 12:49 +0200, Moritz Bartl t...@wiredwings.com
wrote:
Hi,
Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we
want to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
complaints.
At the moment, I allow ports
Hi,
Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we want
to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
complaints.
At the moment, I allow ports 20-22,53,79-81,110,143,443,706,873,993,
995,8008,8080,. Feel free to suggest others.
If you've filed the
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 5:49 AM, Moritz Bartl t...@wiredwings.com wrote:
Hi,
Out of curiosity, what exit policy are you now using? Perhaps we want
to standardize on a policy that is effective at reducing these
complaints.
At the moment, I allow ports 20-22,53,79-81,110,143,443,706,873,993,
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:03 AM, Jon torance...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know if this will help or not, but in the states, my ISP
provider calls me when they get a complaint. They tell me what the
complaint was about, I get the ports the issues came thru and what
they were. All except the
If you can get SoftLayer to do SWIP on the IP address/range assigned to
you, that will offload their complaint person and let you handle
everything automatically.
Agreed. Having the whois info for your TOR box come to you as an
ORG-ABUSE will offload a lot of this from Softlayer. BayTSP,
Hi,
BayTSP/MediaSentry/etc have heard all the
excuses, including when they tagged my printer as serving up movies;
they don't care. I fully expect they don't even read the responses, just
check that a response was received. The response is probably then
catalogued for some future court
Hi,
After running our 300MBit/s Tor node for less than a week, the US data
center Softlayer has forced me to limit our exit policy to well-known
ports after receiving 25 automated Torrent DMCA complaints this weekend
and again more than 20 in the last two days. I hope that now that the
policy is
Thus spake Moritz Bartl (t...@wiredwings.com):
After running our 300MBit/s Tor node for less than a week, the US data
center Softlayer has forced me to limit our exit policy to well-known
ports after receiving 25 automated Torrent DMCA complaints this weekend
and again more than 20 in the
On Wed, 23 Jun 2010 02:20:16 +0200
Moritz Bartl t...@wiredwings.com wrote:
All these complaints list pretty much the same Torrents, have been
issued by MediaSentry or BayTSP, and each offers to get back to them
on changing email addresses and through a web form. For each single
abuse case, I
19 matches
Mail list logo
