On 02/24/10 23:16, Ted Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:56 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
[]
Perhaps mention the benefits of TPM chips (on 'ix, they can be
configured to benefit the user, not some record company)?
Yup. Check out Trusted Grub if you're blessed with the appropriate
hardware.
On Thu, 2010-02-25 at 13:41 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
On 02/24/10 23:16, Ted Smith wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:56 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
[]
Perhaps mention the benefits of TPM chips (on 'ix, they can be
configured to benefit the user, not some record company)?
Yup. Check out
On 02/24/10 00:10, Ringo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One update that should be noted is that this doesn't protect against
bad nanny attacks. With full disk encryption, the boot partition isn't
encrypted (as you have to load it so it can ask for your passphrase and
On Wed, 2010-02-24 at 11:56 -0500, 7v5w7go9ub0o wrote:
On 02/24/10 00:10, Ringo wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One update that should be noted is that this doesn't protect against
bad nanny attacks. With full disk encryption, the boot partition isn't
encrypted
Good job!
IMHO this is a very nice paper; well written!
(Adjusted the title of this post a bit, in case the readers weren't
aware your goal )
(FWIW, some might want to read the paper - to gain a lot of insight and
background - and then download/test a copy of your (sanitized) .img
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
One update that should be noted is that this doesn't protect against
bad nanny attacks. With full disk encryption, the boot partition isn't
encrypted (as you have to load it so it can ask for your passphrase and
decrypt the rest of the drive). If the
6 matches
Mail list logo
