torstatus IPv6

2010-12-15 Thread Olaf Selke
Hi, according my Apache log files the ratio between IPv6 and IPv4 access to torstatus.blutmagie.de is about 1:100. Domestic as well as foreign government agencies do not appear very much IPv6 enabled. regards Olaf

IPv6

2010-11-04 Thread Olaf Selke
Hi, will Tor clients take any advantage from an exit node with IPv6 connectivity? cheers Olaf *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org

Re: IPv6

2010-11-04 Thread grarpamp
It doesn't seem that Tor is binding and transporting IPv6 yet. However the client could presumably set up a VPN with a tunnel broker. And do some interesting things with OnionCat as well. The last mention of IPV6 in the release notes was 0.2.1.18. On 11/4/10, Olaf Selke olaf.se...@blutmagie.de

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-05 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
On 2010-09-02 19:51, Roger Dingledine wrote: On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? I found out about this as the Fedora dhclient-script (part of ISC dhcp-4.2.0) wipes out

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-05 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
resolv.conf with the info received from the dhcp server(s). In my xs4all.nl case the ipv6 dhcp server gives me ipv6 number for the nameservers. Udo *** To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with unsubscribe or-talk

tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-02 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
Hello, Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? I found out about this as the Fedora dhclient-script (part of ISC dhcp-4.2.0) wipes out resolv.conf and replaces it with whatever the dhclient receives. Please discuss if this is reasonable behaviour

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-02 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
On 2010-09-02 17:34, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? Some logging: Sep 02 03:16:05.931 [notice] Tor 0.2.2.15-alpha (git-eba3f37f17a2af4f) opening new log file. Sep 02 03:16:05.933 [notice] Configured hibernation

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-02 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Udo van den Heuvel udo...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 2010-09-02 17:34, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? Sadly, yeah. As a workaround, if you build Tor with Libevent 2.0.x, Tor will use

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-02 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
On 2010-09-02 18:56, Nick Mathewson wrote: On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Udo van den Heuvel udo...@xs4all.nl wrote: On 2010-09-02 17:34, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? Sadly, yeah. As a workaround

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-02 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? I found out about this as the Fedora dhclient-script (part of ISC dhcp-4.2.0) wipes out resolv.conf and replaces it with whatever

Re: tor and resolv.conf / ipv6

2010-09-02 Thread Sebastian Lechte
Out of lurking: On 02.09.2010 19:51, Roger Dingledine wrote: On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 05:34:53PM +0200, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Tor chokes and stops when it finds ipv6 numbers in resolv.conf. Is this a known issue? I believe non-exit relays, and even bridges, will try to parse /etc

IPv6

2009-08-16 Thread James Brown
When does the tor team intend to include supporting IPv6 in the Tor? And do they intend do it in principle?

Re: IPv6

2009-08-16 Thread Gregory Maxwell
On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 2:54 AM, James Brownjbrownfi...@gmail.com wrote: When does the tor team intend to include supporting IPv6 in the Tor? And do they intend do it in principle? Do you mean making IPv6 connections via Tor or using IPv6 as a transport for TOR? These things are serve distinct

Re: IPv6

2009-08-16 Thread James Brown
Gregory Maxwell wrote: On Sun, Aug 16, 2009 at 2:54 AM, James Brownjbrownfi...@gmail.com wrote: When does the tor team intend to include supporting IPv6 in the Tor? And do they intend do it in principle? Do you mean making IPv6 connections via Tor or using IPv6 as a transport

Re: IPv6

2009-08-16 Thread Andrew Lewman
On 08/16/2009 02:54 AM, James Brown wrote: When does the tor team intend to include supporting IPv6 in the Tor? And do they intend do it in principle? We partially do already. Some easy things to do: 0) read the FAQ, http://wiki.noreply.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#IPv6. The key

Re: tor over ipv6

2009-02-05 Thread Francis GUDIN
Hi, On Monday, 19 January 2009 at 17:13:45 -0500, Nick Mathewson wrote : Hang on! This is a FAQ! The state of, and issues surrounding, IPv6 in Tor are explained here: https://wiki.torproject.org/noreply/TheOnionRouter/TorFAQ#IPv6 Please excuse my naive question: wouldn't *requiring

Re: tor over ipv6

2009-01-23 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: For anyone who wants to try IPv6: If you're running Linux, there's a write-up on http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/ipv6-connectivity.html Thanks, My tunnel now appears to work. (still have to figure out how I can make it start after the IPv4 ppp0 comes up

Re: tor over ipv6

2009-01-22 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
For anyone who wants to try IPv6: If you're running Linux, there's a write-up on http://www.pps.jussieu.fr/~jch/software/ipv6-connectivity.html Juliusz

Re: tor over ipv6

2009-01-20 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
Nick Mathewson wrote: a) does tor work well with IPv6? No. Right now, it doesn't work at all with IPv6. There are two kinds of ways Tor might support IPv6: first, .. Hang on! This is a FAQ! The state of, and issues surrounding, IPv6 in Tor are explained here: https

Re: tor over ipv6

2009-01-20 Thread Arjan
Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Just a thought: With the previous tor experiences in mind w.r.t. services blocking me, I thought about IPv6. I could run a somewhat open relay on an IPv6 number via a IPv6 in IPV4 tunnel if I (ever) get that to work. My isp (xs4all) offers such a tunnel for free

tor over ipv6

2009-01-19 Thread Udo van den Heuvel
Just a thought: With the previous tor experiences in mind w.r.t. services blocking me, I thought about IPv6. I could run a somewhat open relay on an IPv6 number via a IPv6 in IPV4 tunnel if I (ever) get that to work. My isp (xs4all) offers such a tunnel for free and a (small?) IPv6 subnet

Re: tor over ipv6

2009-01-19 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Mon, Jan 19, 2009 at 07:54:53PM +0100, Udo van den Heuvel wrote: Just a thought: With the previous tor experiences in mind w.r.t. services blocking me, I thought about IPv6. I could run a somewhat open relay on an IPv6 number via a IPv6 in IPV4 tunnel if I (ever) get that to work. My

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-27 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
If you are using Tor (and have Firefox configured to use the HTTP proxy), Firefox will not use the proxy for IPv6 traffic. Nonsense. At the time at which Firefox decides whether to make a request through a proxy, it doesn't yet know whether the target server has an IPv6 address. What you're

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass NOT A BUG

2007-10-27 Thread Ringo Kamens
Thanks for the clarification. It's much easier to understand now. Comrade Ringo Kamens On 10/26/07, Nick 'Zaf' Clifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nick 'Zaf' Clifford wrote: Hey ya, Just noticed one small problem with Tor + Firefox + IPv6. I'm aware that Tor doesn't yet support IPv6, but I

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-26 Thread Arrakis
Greetings and welcome to 2006! 3, Steve Excerpt from How To Create Torpark Step 31. set as follows: noscript.notify.hideDelay = 30 noscript.statusIcon = false network.dns.disableIPv6 = true ; ipv6 addresses fail through tor. network.proxy.socks_remote_dns = true

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-26 Thread Jacob Appelbaum
Arrakis wrote: Greetings and welcome to 2006! 3, Steve Excerpt from How To Create Torpark Step 31. set as follows: noscript.notify.hideDelay = 30 noscript.statusIcon = false network.dns.disableIPv6 = true ; ipv6 addresses fail through tor

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-26 Thread Mike Perry
noscript.statusIcon = false network.dns.disableIPv6 = true ; ipv6 addresses fail through tor. Does this in fact block ipv6 if no DNS is involved and image links are numerical only? I am living in the dark ages of ipv4. Can someone who has ipv6 verify this for us? From reading: http

Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-25 Thread Nick 'Zaf' Clifford
Hey ya, Just noticed one small problem with Tor + Firefox + IPv6. I'm aware that Tor doesn't yet support IPv6, but I found an interesting development with respect to a system that has IPv6 configured and working. If you are using Tor (and have Firefox configured to use the HTTP proxy), Firefox

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-25 Thread Mike Perry
Thus spake Nick 'Zaf' Clifford ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): Hey ya, Just noticed one small problem with Tor + Firefox + IPv6. I'm aware that Tor doesn't yet support IPv6, but I found an interesting development with respect to a system that has IPv6 configured and working. If you are using Tor

Re: Firefox IPv6 Anonymity bypass

2007-10-25 Thread Kyle Williams
Nice find! Thanks for reporting it. On 10/25/07, Nick 'Zaf' Clifford [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey ya, Just noticed one small problem with Tor + Firefox + IPv6. I'm aware that Tor doesn't yet support IPv6, but I found an interesting development with respect to a system that has IPv6

Re: IPv6

2006-06-09 Thread Nick Mathewson
On Thu, Jun 08, 2006 at 07:11:07PM -0400, Watson Ladd wrote: Is tor IPv6 ready? Nope. There are two things that you might mean by IPv6-ready, and Tor is neither. You might mean, Can Tor connect to hosts that only have IPv6 addresses? or you might mean, Can Tor support servers

IPv6

2006-06-08 Thread Watson Ladd
Is tor IPv6 ready? And will tor use IPsec for securing communications between nodes if available? If not, what needs to be done to make this possible? Sincerely, Watson Ladd (sorry if this is a dupe.) --- Those who would give up Essential Liberty to purchase a little Temporary Safety deserve