A frequently stated problem with Tor is the poor performance and
improving this is the goal of several sub-projects. One of these is to
simply encourage the deployment of more Tor servers. This will
increase the capacity of the network, but the consequent improvement
to users is more difficult to
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:52:14PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake Mike Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
RELAY_EXTEND is the way this is done. I believe clients can and do
send multiple RELAY_EXTENDs in a row, so it's not like its a
Sorry, I'm a moron. I meant to say RELAY_BEGIN. Also,
Thus spake Roger Dingledine ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, Jul 18, 2007 at 07:52:14PM -0700, Mike Perry wrote:
Thus spake Mike Perry ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
RELAY_EXTEND is the way this is done. I believe clients can and do
send multiple RELAY_EXTENDs in a row, so it's not like its a
They can be issued concurrently. Tor doesn't care.
Indeed; I will see vidalia show a lot of connectings all at once,
followed by all switching to open at once (TCP streams inside a tor
circuit).
The overhead to open a new TCP HTTP connection through a tor circuit
seems to be very long. I know
4 matches
Mail list logo