On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 09:18:04 -0400 Andrew Lewman
wrote:
>On 07/15/2009 02:35 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > Then you're remembering it from somewhere else because neither that
>> thread nor the first of the two it refers to say anything about it. (The
>> second reference is apparently no
On 07/15/2009 02:35 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> Then you're remembering it from somewhere else because neither that
> thread nor the first of the two it refers to say anything about it. (The
> second reference is apparently no longer available at the link given.)
It's entirely possible I've
> >>> enable-remote-toggle 0
> >>> enable-remote-http-toggle 0
> >>> enable-edit-actions 0
> >>> allow-cgi-request-crunching 0
Folks, the default install of the current release of privoxy sets
all of these to 0. That means the named features can't be changed
via config.privoxy.org. You'd nee
On Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:50:23 -0400 : Andrew Lewman
wrote:
>On 07/09/2009 01:36 PM, Lee wrote:
>
enable-remote-toggle 0
enable-remote-http-toggle 0
enable-edit-actions 0
allow-cgi-request-crunching 0
>>> I'm trying to find the email thread, but until then, even with these
On 07/09/2009 01:36 PM, Lee wrote:
>>> enable-remote-toggle 0
>>> enable-remote-http-toggle 0
>>> enable-edit-actions 0
>>> allow-cgi-request-crunching 0
>> I'm trying to find the email thread, but until then, even with these
>> set, it was demonstrated someone can manipulate your privoxy config
Andrew Lewman wrote:
> A) The Privoxies after 3.06 have a local "web control interface"
> which we believe is a security risk. We think that remote websites can
> probably reconfigure your privoxy via that interface, maybe even without
> your noticing. If newer versions have the ability to disabl
* on the Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 01:44:22AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>> A long time ago I think there was a problem with the .exit... in the URL
>> being passed along to the website in the GET (or other) requests, which
>> sometimes caused problems. Somebody correct me if I am wrong, but I
>> bel
On Fri, 10 Jul 2009 00:15:18 -0600 Jim McClanahan
wrote:
>Scott Bennett wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:37:38 -0400 downie -
>> wrote:
>> >Will Polipo be able to filter out .exit notation?
>> >
>> Why would you want it to do that? The .exit notation has to be passed
>> along t
Scott Bennett wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:37:38 -0400 downie -
> wrote:
> >Will Polipo be able to filter out .exit notation?
> >
> Why would you want it to do that? The .exit notation has to be passed
> along to tor for it to work. If it were filtered out, then the user would
> s
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 20:37:38 -0400 downie -
wrote:
>> Date: Thu=2C 9 Jul 2009 12:11:06 -0400
>> From: and...@torproject.org
>> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
>> Subject: Re: Yahoo Mail and Tor
>>=20
>> On 07/09/2009 11:25 AM=2C Scott Bennett wrote:
>>
> Date: Thu, 9 Jul 2009 12:11:06 -0400
> From: and...@torproject.org
> To: or-talk@freehaven.net
> Subject: Re: Yahoo Mail and Tor
>
> On 07/09/2009 11:25 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> > Does polipo do all the other good things that privoxy does, including
>
On 7/9/09, Andrew Lewman wrote:
> On 07/09/2009 11:25 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
>
>> enable-remote-toggle 0
>> enable-remote-http-toggle 0
>> enable-edit-actions 0
>> allow-cgi-request-crunching 0
>
> I'm trying to find the email thread, but until then, even with these
> set, it was demonstrated
On 07/09/2009 11:25 AM, Scott Bennett wrote:
> enable-remote-toggle 0
> enable-remote-http-toggle 0
> enable-edit-actions 0
> allow-cgi-request-crunching 0
I'm trying to find the email thread, but until then, even with these
set, it was demonstrated someone can manipulate your privoxy config by
On Thu, 09 Jul 2009 10:46:05 -0400 Andrew Lewman
wrote:
>On 07/09/2009 02:20 AM, bao song wrote:
>> The standard Tor bundle download for non-Windows still
>> includes Privoxy 3.0.6, which mangles Yahoo mail. Any chance of
>> either an update to a later version of Privoxy or an alternative
>>
On 07/09/2009 02:20 AM, bao song wrote:
> The standard Tor bundle download for non-Windows still
> includes Privoxy 3.0.6, which mangles Yahoo mail. Any chance of
> either an update to a later version of Privoxy or an alternative
> privacy package in the standard Tor download for non-Windows OSs?
On Thu, 9 Jul 2009 16:14:06 +0200 Hannah Schroeter
wrote:
>On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:47:39AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>>[...]
>
>> If you're running NetBSD or OpenBSD, you may be able to do something
>>similar, but I'm not familiar with their methods. (Perhaps Hannah could
>>give an
Hi!
On Thu, Jul 09, 2009 at 01:47:39AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote:
>[...]
> If you're running NetBSD or OpenBSD, you may be able to do something
>similar, but I'm not familiar with their methods. (Perhaps Hannah could
>give an OpenBSD example here, please?)
For OpenBSD, the recommended way
bao song wrote:
> The standard Tor bundle download for non-Windows still includes
> Privoxy 3.0.6, which mangles Yahoo mail.
I am running privoxy 3.0.6. If you want to email me off-list I will be
happy to send you my user.action file which seems to more or less work
adequately for Yahoo mail.
On Wed, 8 Jul 2009 23:20:08 -0700 (PDT) bao song
wrote:
>What about those of us who consider Windows to be the Abomination of Desola=
>tion (1010011010) and refuse to run that operating system?
>Privoxy provides pre-compiled Windows versions, but I was unable to downloa=
>d the source for Priv
ownload for non-Windows OSs?
Yours,
Michael
--- On Mon, 6/7/09, Roger Dingledine wrote:
From: Roger Dingledine
Subject: Re: Yahoo Mail and Tor
To: or-talk@freehaven.net
Received: Monday, 6 July, 2009, 11:06 AM
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:51:03AM +0400, James Brown wrote:
> > Are you by any cha
On Mon, Jul 06, 2009 at 10:51:03AM +0400, James Brown wrote:
> > Are you by any chance using the Vidalia bundle which unfortunately
> > contains a Privoxy version that is several years out of date?
> >
> > As far as I know, the Yahoo-related problems have been fixed
> > quite some time ago and i
Fabian Keil пишет:
> bao song wrote:
>
>
>> Two months??? I have had trouble with Yahoo Mail via Privoxy for more
>> than four years.
>>
>
> I'm sorry to hear that.
>
> Are you by any chance using the Vidalia bundle which unfortunately
> contains a Privoxy version that is several years out
bao song wrote:
> Two months??? I have had trouble with Yahoo Mail via Privoxy for more
> than four years.
I'm sorry to hear that.
Are you by any chance using the Vidalia bundle which unfortunately
contains a Privoxy version that is several years out of date?
> At first, I was given some confi
Two months??? I have had trouble with Yahoo Mail via Privoxy for more than four
years.
At first, I was given some config file modifications for Privoxy so it would
allow me to use Yahoo Mail, but this disabled a lot of the stuff Privoxy did,
and I wanted that stuff for other sites. Also, I was
24 matches
Mail list logo
