On 07/02/2009 11:12 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
There are many people who would like to run tor exits but whom don't
because of the inevitable flood of abuse complaints.
This is a fine use of exit policies. If potential exit-node operators
feel this gives them safety and security, then they
Drake Wilson skrev:
My initial impulse would be to allow end sites to declare that they
are willing to receive connections via Tor. Using DNS records, for
instance, of a style like:
_toraccept.example.net TXT toraccept1: 80,443,6667,9000,,
(and/or)
be widespread enough to provide a real increase in
effective exit bandwidth. If the safe list doesn't include some of
the highest bandwidth sites then its introduction (in whatever form)
would probably decrease the available can reach anything exit
capacity.
I think some of the most many safe
it be to create a community managed list of 'safe
destinations' distributed by the directory servers as a single object
which exit operators could include in in their exit policies and
further refine with local rules?
Some exit operators would likely switch to safe-mode, reducing the
total amount of universal
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
How awful would it be to create a community managed list of 'safe
destinations' distributed by the directory servers as a single object
which exit operators could include in in their exit policies and
further refine with local rules?
I would not like _one_ list
to connect again because of this.
How awful would it be to create a community managed list of 'safe
destinations' distributed by the directory servers as a single object
which exit operators could include in in their exit policies and
further refine with local rules?
My initial impulse would
of 'safe
destinations' distributed by the directory servers as a single object
which exit operators could include in in their exit policies and
further refine with local rules?
Some exit operators would likely switch to safe-mode, reducing the
total amount of universal-exit capacity but if the safe
Gregory -
I have been struggling with a similar question. I do not have an answer as
to the perfect list of 'safe' sites (wikipedia is at the top of my list).
But I have authored a bash script to turn a list of domains (
mail.google.com, wikipedia.com, etc.com) into rules
The following script
8 matches
Mail list logo
