Re: Servers and the Named flag (was Re: time needed to register a serve)

2007-10-01 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Mon, Sep 24, 2007 at 05:38:18AM -0700, Robert W Capps II wrote: Interesting, while the server config page clearly says the email may not be answered, it does not indicate that the email will most likely never be ACTIONED. If it is the intention to not register names for servers, then

Re: Servers and the Named flag (was Re: time needed to register a serve)

2007-09-24 Thread Paul Syverson
On Sun, Sep 23, 2007 at 04:37:27PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: Once upon a time (2003 era), you needed to be manually approved or you wouldn't be able to join the network. The primary reason was that we needed to verify that your server was reachable, working, etc. Then we got more than a

Servers and the Named flag (was Re: time needed to register a serve)

2007-09-23 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Tue, Sep 18, 2007 at 03:06:53AM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: Does anyone have a sense of the current processing delay in registering a server? I ask only because I sent off the registration information to [EMAIL PROTECTED] last Thursday evening, 13 Sept., and my server is still showing