Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-27 Thread Anon Mus
and...@torproject.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:11:55AM +, my.green.lant...@googlemail.com wrote 2.3K bytes in 61 lines about: : So if Tor is using usual development practice then why does the : stable version manual : (http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en) have : "*Warn

Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-27 Thread andrew
On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 10:11:55AM +, my.green.lant...@googlemail.com wrote 2.3K bytes in 61 lines about: : So if Tor is using usual development practice then why does the : stable version manual : (http://www.torproject.org/docs/tor-manual.html.en) have : "*WarnUnsafeSocks" in it if there has

Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-26 Thread Anon Mus
rsions. It would then be possible to have just one manual covering ALL Tor versions, stable and dev. e.g. StrictExitNodes 0|1 (Added v?.?.?.?-alpha and v?.?.?.?-stable, Deprecated v0.2.2.7-alpha and v?.?.?.?-stable, Removed v0.?.?.?-alpha etc - see replacement command StrictNodes) Blah.. bl

Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-25 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 05:52:36PM +, Anon Mus wrote: > Matthew wrote: >> I think I am correct to say that StrictExitNodes has been negated in >> favour of StrictNodes. >> >> However, when I use StrictExitNodes 1 I have no problems. >> >> When I use

Re: StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-25 Thread Anon Mus
Matthew wrote: I think I am correct to say that StrictExitNodes has been negated in favour of StrictNodes. However, when I use StrictExitNodes 1 I have no problems. When I use StrictNodes 1 and have viable ExitNodes then Vidalia gives the error: "Vidalia detected that the Tor software e

StrictNodes or StrictExitNodes?

2010-11-21 Thread Matthew
I think I am correct to say that StrictExitNodes has been negated in favour of StrictNodes. However, when I use StrictExitNodes 1 I have no problems. When I use StrictNodes 1 and have viable ExitNodes then Vidalia gives the error: "Vidalia detected that the Tor software exited unexpec

Re: StrictNodes

2010-10-05 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Oct 5, 2010, at 9:05 PM, krishna e bera wrote: On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Geoff Down wrote: "[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use 'StrictNodes' instead." It would help if such an option were documented in

Re: StrictNodes

2010-10-05 Thread krishna e bera
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:57:42PM +0100, Geoff Down wrote: > "[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use > 'StrictNodes' instead." > It would help if such an option were documented in > https://www.torproject.org/tor-manual.

Re: StrictNodes

2010-10-05 Thread Geoff Down
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 15:07 -0400, "Andrew Lewman" wrote: > On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:57:42 +0100 > "Geoff Down" wrote: > > > "[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use > > 'StrictNodes' instead.&

Re: StrictNodes

2010-10-05 Thread Andrew Lewman
On Tue, 05 Oct 2010 19:57:42 +0100 "Geoff Down" wrote: > "[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use > 'StrictNodes' instead." > It would help if such an option were documented in > https://www.torproject.org/t

Re: StrictNodes

2010-10-05 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Oct 5, 2010, at 8:57 PM, Geoff Down wrote: "[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use 'StrictNodes' instead." It would help if such an option were documented in https://www.torproject.org/tor-manual.html.en or shipped in the exper

StrictNodes

2010-10-05 Thread Geoff Down
"[warn] The configuration option 'StrictExitNodes' is deprecated; use 'StrictNodes' instead." It would help if such an option were documented in https://www.torproject.org/tor-manual.html.en or shipped in the expert install package. Where is it documented please?