On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 11:23:15PM -0400, waterwai...@gmx.com wrote 0.4K bytes
in 16 lines about:
: In this case, purposely 'shaping' the traffic so that it looks like something
other than what it actually is (ie, not Tor traffic).
I call that traffic masking. As far as research has shown, it
Does Tor do any kind of traffic shaping?
.w
***
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majord...@torproject.org with
unsubscribe or-talkin the body. http://archives.seul.org/or/talk/
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 06:40:56PM -0400, waterwai...@gmx.com wrote 0.2K bytes
in 11 lines about:
: Does Tor do any kind of traffic shaping?
What do you mean by traffic shaping?
--
Andrew Lewman
The Tor Project
pgp 0x31B0974B
Website: https://www.torproject.org/
Blog: https
In this case, purposely 'shaping' the traffic so that it looks like something
other than what it actually is (ie, not Tor traffic).
.w
On May 15, 2010, at 11:18 PM, and...@torproject.org wrote:
What do you mean by traffic shaping
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I know on HyperWRT/Thibor, it has QoS functions for port ranges and
Ethernet ports.
I recently moved kitsune to an older machine (still enough for the
small amount of bandwidth I'm relaying anyway - and at least it's a
dedicated Linux box now!).
Thus spake Marco Bonetti ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Wed, September 26, 2007 02:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like the script needs Tor to run on a virtual address.
This could be done by adding another address to your default interface
Yesterday night (CEST) I've modified the script to
On Wed, October 3, 2007 10:29, Mike Perry wrote:
Actually, my iptables manpage only says that pid, sid and command
matching are broken on SMP. Perhaps UID is actually safe?
yup you're right, also http://linux.die.net/man/8/iptables said so.
I probably misread ubuntu page :)
I'll remove the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
warning removed: http://sidbox.homelinux.org/~sid77/tor.html
feel free to use it and/or incorporate any changes back into your script :)
ciao
- --
Marco Bonetti
Slackintosh Linux Project Developer: http://www.slackintosh.org
Linux-live for powerpc:
On Sun, September 30, 2007 23:50, Linus Lüssing wrote:
Thanks a lot for spending some time to edit this script.
well, thanks :)
not an hard hack though: I've just deleted some lines and modified the
iptables marking rule :-P
Can you tell me a programm with which I could monitor the bandwidth
Ok, I think it works, the latency for internet connections goes down
from horrible ~500ms to 40-80ms, when I start the script.
Can you tell me a programm with which I could monitor the bandwidth usage
of tor only
I think that BandwidthRate and BandwidthBurst options are safe enough
No, no,
On Wed, September 26, 2007 02:41, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It looks like the script needs Tor to run on a virtual address.
This could be done by adding another address to your default interface
Yesterday night (CEST) I've modified the script to use only one ip, packet
matching is done via uid.
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 07:41:27AM +0530, Strykar wrote:
Burst bandwidth wouldn't hurt the network.
If you want bandwidth shaping, I'd suggest using pf (Open/FreeBSD) for
traffic shaping.
iptables + tc never did the job for me and it's the reason I tried pf in the
first place.
Pf has
On Tue, September 25, 2007 02:32, Linus Lüssing wrote:
My problem is, that I'm sharing the Bandwidth of my ADSL Internet
connection (50KiB/s upload) with TOR and some other applications
I've a similar setup with a slightly better upload rate (64KB nominal) and
I don't use shaping at all. I've
suggest using pf (Open/FreeBSD) for
traffic shaping.
iptables + tc never did the job for me and it's the reason I tried pf in the
first place.
Pf has incredibly legible syntax and reading the pf faq will get you up and
running in no time.
Sounds good, but I don't want to move from Debian to Open
. Talks with VoIP hangs badly, while
TOR is running too. I've always got to stop the process first (what is
really annoying, cause I've got to connect over SSH to my
mini-linux-server in the cellar first).
If you want bandwidth shaping, I'd suggest using pf (Open/FreeBSD) for
traffic shaping
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:32:44AM +0200, Linus L?ssing wrote:
Hi there!
My problem is, that I'm sharing the Bandwidth of my ADSL Internet
connection (50KiB/s upload) with TOR and some other applications (i.e.
online games, VPN-Server, small Teamspeak-Server, VoIP) as well. I've
read, that
16 matches
Mail list logo
