Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-20 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> Bittorrent is indeed heavy on resource consumption and that's why it's on > the default reject list, I think, but saying it will disrupt the network, > come on, it's a bit hard to tell Dear Marco, The issue is somewhat controversial, and as far as I know it's not discussed in detail anywhere.

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Gab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Ok ! Gab - -- http://www.gabrix.ath.cx - -- sec 1024D/80231A90 2008-07-01 Key fingerprint = 54AC C632 B35E FB9B 6D9F 108D DBE6 5425 8023 1A90 uid

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Ted Smith
On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 23:07 +0200, Gab wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA512 > > What about tor hidden free secure shells ? > If you mean over hidden services, that won't involve a Tor exit, so it won't show up in these statistics. signature.asc Description: This is a dig

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Gab
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 What about tor hidden free secure shells ? Gab - -- http://www.gabrix.ath.cx - -- sec 1024D/80231A90 2008-07-01 Key fingerprint = 54AC C632 B35E FB9B 6D9F 108D

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Paul Syverson
On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 02:19:28PM +0200, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > > On Apr 19, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Tripple Moon wrote: >>> Your list doesn't include for example 22 (ssh), which >>> is absolutely essential for many of us. >> Well see...from my point of view SSH is abuse of the tor-network, namely >>

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Marco Bonetti
On Sun, April 19, 2009 14:19, Sebastian Hahn wrote: > Go read the website first. Please, could you give me a pointer about it? I've just ran a "site:torproject.org bittorrent" through scroogle and the only relevant results are (in order of appearence (to me)): 1) https://wiki.torproject.org/norepl

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Sebastian Hahn
On Apr 19, 2009, at 10:21 AM, Tripple Moon wrote: Your list doesn't include for example 22 (ssh), which is absolutely essential for many of us. Well see...from my point of view SSH is abuse of the tor-network, namely aiding in hacking other systems. (see my other posts for my logic) To use S

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-19 Thread Tripple Moon
--- On Fri, 4/17/09, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote: > From: Juliusz Chroboczek > Subject: Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days > To: or-talk@freehaven.net > Date: Friday, April 17, 2009, 6:14 PM > > A better [idea] would be, again IMHO, open a list of > ports used

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-17 Thread Juliusz Chroboczek
> A better [idea] would be, again IMHO, open a list of ports used by > "normal-use of the tor-network", and block the rest. [...] > Web (80,443), Pop3 (*), NNTP (*), DNS (53), Torrent (default 6881), FTP > (20/21). Moon, Please don't give this kind of advice. Somebody might think you know what

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-16 Thread Tripple Moon
--- On Thu, 4/16/09, Scott Bennett wrote: > >There are plenty of other ports to do this on, though - > >many of them far more common than 1080 (and SOCKS) nowadays. > > > Right. I think I'll hold off a bit longer to see > what other comments > people may make here before I close that port.

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-15 Thread Scott Bennett
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:00:55 -0700 "F. Fox" wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: >(snip) 2) Why are there so many exits to the standard socks port? It seems kind of strange to go all the way through the tor network fully encrypted, only to exit in the clear to a port somewher

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-15 Thread F. Fox
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Scott Bennett wrote: (snip) >>> 2) Why are there so many exits to the standard socks port? It >>> seems kind of strange to go all the way through the tor network >>> fully encrypted, only to exit in the clear to a port somewhere >>>

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-14 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:06:22 +0200 Sven Anderson wrote: >Am 13.04.2009 um 19:00 schrieb Scott Bennett: >> >> 1) Why is the nicname/whois port the most heavily used? In fact, >> why is it getting much use at all? > >My guess: spammers and profilers, scanning for email adresses and

Re: exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-14 Thread Sven Anderson
Hi Scott, Am 13.04.2009 um 19:00 schrieb Scott Bennett: 1) Why is the nicname/whois port the most heavily used? In fact, why is it getting much use at all? My guess: spammers and profilers, scanning for email adresses and other personal data. 2) Why are there so

exit counts by port number over 61 days

2009-04-13 Thread Scott Bennett
I thought I'd post the results of a 61-day period of running my exit node in case they are of interest to others and because some that seem anomalous to me might then turn up explanations. The first list is sorted by port number, and the second is the same list resorted by exit count in desce