no problem, I accept yours and others assertions that a home made
magnetic device won't work.
It occurs to me that in any case where even one operator knows or has
possession/knowledge of the keys or backups,
that that information could still be gained through torture/coercion in
rare cases where
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others (friend
of yours maybe?)
And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
they, of course, are doing the censoring.
On Wed, 5 Dec 2007 19:30:04 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:05:27PM
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
And I thought the people on this list were against censorship, unless
they, of course, are doing the censoring.
I'm trying to follow the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess you can read one persons attack but are blind to others
What attack?
OK, i swept back through the postings and /dev/ass wasn't nice too. Got
that, Eugen?
Whatever.
Back to business.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thanks for the information. That's yet another way in which
Microslop
appears to have failed to keep up with the times.
Fwiw vista has bitlocker, which encrypts partitions or the whole hard disk.
Unfortunately it requires a
On Fri, 07 Dec 2007 22:44:23 +0600 Vlad \SATtva\ Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Scott Bennett wrote on 05.12.2007 04:14:
I have not run a tor server, so I do not know the exact requirements.=
Can it be done from a ram drive?
It could, but you'd need to make sure it doesn't swap/page down
Scott Bennett wrote on 05.12.2007 04:14:
I have not run a tor server, so I do not know the exact requirements.
Can it be done from a ram drive?
It could, but you'd need to make sure it doesn't swap/page down to disk,
which would be bad.
I'm not a LINUX user, but I would be surprised if
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
coderman wrote:
On Dec 5, 2007 4:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Have you actually tested using a magnetic field for this ...
despite the rudeness of some of this thread,
(snip)
You sure aren't kidding... sheesh! =:o\
see
On Dec 5, 2007 4:05 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
... Have you actually tested using a magnetic field for this ...
despite the rudeness of some of this thread, it really is difficult to
properly clear / purge data from a modern hard disk using a magnetic
field. we do this at work, and the
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 05:05:27PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote 2.6K bytes in
66 lines about:
: Hey Eugene, go fuck yourself ok? Have you actually tested using a
: magnetic field for this, no.
: Seems to me you're the one talking out of dev/ass, cuz you are one. And
: don't put it past someone
By full disk encryption I guess your talking about access via a pass
phrase.
Judge: Ok you are to be held in contempt and in jail xyz, until such
time as you give us the pass phrase to your data
Most data overwrite programs take too long-you do not have that time
when they are knocking down your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Judge: Ok you are to be held in contempt and in jail xyz, until such
time as you give us the pass phrase to your data
Only a matter of the UK at the moment. Bad enough though.
Most data overwrite programs take too
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:35:49PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judge: Ok you are to be held in contempt and in jail xyz, until such
time as you give us the pass phrase to your data
Plausible deniability. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TrueCrypt
Most data overwrite programs take too
On Dec 4, 2007 3:35 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A strong magnetic field close to the hard drive will completely destroy
the data making it impossible to recover. I will also probably fuckup
the drive mechanism, rendering the drive useless.
If by strong you mean a super conducting magnet of
On Tue, 04 Dec 2007 22:13:08 +0100 Alexander W. Janssen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Judge: Ok you are to be held in contempt and in jail xyz, until such
time as you give us the pass phrase to your data
Only a matter of the UK at the moment. Bad enough though.
Most
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alexander W. Janssen wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
(snip)
I have not run a tor server, so I do not know the exact requirements.
Can it be done from a ram drive?
It could, but you'd need to make sure it doesn't swap/page down to disk,
which
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Eugen Leitl wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:35:49PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
Most data overwrite programs take too long-you do not have that time
when they are knocking down your door.
You have to power down the servers before
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Scott Bennett wrote:
(snip)
I'm not a LINUX user, but I would be surprised if there were not some
similar facility in LINUX, but I haven't the foggiest notion how one would get
Windows XP to encrypt its swapping/paging file or even whether
On Dec 2, 2007 2:25 PM, F. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ strange, dangerous, and likely to fail methods for destroying
drives ]
use full disk encryption, even the latest ubuntu supports this.
Last time I tried this with the Ubuntu 7.10 Alternate CD it didn't
work. The installer crashes
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
coderman wrote:
apologies in advance for veering this far off topic...
On Dec 2, 2007 2:25 PM, F. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ strange, dangerous, and likely to fail methods for destroying drives ]
use full disk encryption, even the latest
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I don't think much of the aforementioned physical destruction methods;
I also agree in that full disk encryption is the best way to go, if at
all possible.
(snip)
While I don't think much of physical destruction either, the encrypted
storage
privacy back-up storage concept:
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=1833093group_id=178712atid=886242
http://forums.truecrypt.org/viewtopic.php?t=8000
2007/12/3, F. Fox [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
22 matches
Mail list logo
