On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 11:45:52 +0700 Roy Lanek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote, quoting me without attribution:
Why, to the administration at the university (or the bosses at the
company) one works for or to one's ISP, of course. Perhaps also to a judge.
Wasn't that obvious?
No, it was not
Roy,
Free, no strings attached. Naturally I cannot disclose what specific
organizations we work with, as that would be counter-intuitive to
privacy protection. Here is one offer, currently, just take a look
for yourself: http://xerobank.com/olympics.php
We'll consider others on a case
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 09:23:44PM -0700, Peter Thoenen wrote:
Was reading Roger's slides and anybody have a link with more info on
slide 41 ... If you can see an SSL-encrypted link, you can guess what
web page is inside based on length
First I am hearing of this one and genuinely curious.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dominik Schaefer wrote:
Those are ports used for mail submission, not for mail relay. They wont
be abused by spammers. ISPs often block their consumer broadband users
from connecting to port 25 on servers outside of their network, to
prevent
any country scoring above 40 on the Press Freedom Index.
8-)
RWB [Reporters sans Frontieres], I was thinking that. Thank you.
/Roy
--
S buruk muka cermin dibelah
S . s l a c k w a r e SS ugly face, the mirror is split [blaming
S +
On 2008-08-19 Scott Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:17:58 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2008-08-19 Scott Bennett, persistently sending his mails without
In-Reply-To- or References-headers, thus continually breaking threads
for everyone else, complained:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 15:23:08 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On 2008-08-19 Scott Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2008 13:17:58 +0200 Ansgar Wiechers wrote:
On 2008-08-19 Scott Bennett, persistently sending his mails without
In-Reply-To- or References-headers, thus continually
Dawney Smith wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
krishna e bera wrote:
I'm not clear on how authentication (on any port) stops spam,
other than the ISP cutting off a given userid after complaints.
A lot of spam already comes from malware infected computers
via their
A lot easier to sell to WHOM? (Let's say you are Novartis ... who are those
which you are--implicitly or not, and slip of the tongue or not--mentioning as
a destination for selling attested, proven sneak-oil ... a lot easier?)
Management.
When I approached the higher-ups about doing a TOR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
For what it's worth, I second Dawn's position on this issue - it could
be very useful to allow 465 and 587 by default.
Indeed, many users have stopped using Gmail because of the privacy
policies; however depending on the purpose of a particular
On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 19:30:25 +0200 Christian Wilms
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've written a a short project report about my Summer of Code project to
improve the performance of hidden services.
It can be found under http://www.ununoctium.de/gsoc08/gsoc_report.pdf
The directory also includes
Ouch. Sorry to hear it. :-(
Scott Bennett, Comm. ASMELG, CFIAG
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott Bennett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Paid performance-tor option?
I really cannot parse the above bit of your writing.
I may know better my 1st
Management.
When I ... [Roy: more garbage deleted] ... with it.
Michael Holstein Cleveland State University
Okay, thank you for the live *demo* [keep reading], and for having volunteered.
Please put your regard here:
Faulty Towers of Belief: Part II. Rebuilding the Road to Freedom of
13 matches
Mail list logo
