Re: ShutdownWaitLength vs. 'restart' in init scripts

2009-06-23 Thread m
If the package came from Fedoras repository they may use their own init-scripts. Contact Fedoras bugreporting. M Bill McGonigle wrote: Hi folks, I noticed a problem with the init script I have with the tor package on Fedora 10. The 'restart' command (just a start and stop) sends a -INT

Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Timo Schoeler
http://joyn.org/conspiracy/ThePiratebay-owned-by-CIA.html

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Harry Hoffman
oh, sure this has been known for a long time. In fact, the CIA will even pay you (much like google adsense) per MB that you allow them to intercept upon exit. At $0.20USD/MB I was able to supplement my regular income. Soon I'll be able to quit my regular job. It's like all of those emails

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Tom Hek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 23, 2009, at 15:01 PM, Harry Hoffman wrote: At $0.20USD/MB I was able to supplement my regular income. Soon I'll be able to quit my regular job. It's like all of those emails say, let your computer work for you! You get payed

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Tom Hek spake: On Jun 23, 2009, at 15:01 PM, Harry Hoffman wrote: At $0.20USD/MB I was able to supplement my regular income. Soon I'll be able to quit my regular job. It's like all of those emails say, let your computer work for you! You get payed $0.20USD/MB? I only got an offer of

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:22:04 +0200 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: http://joyn.org/conspiracy/ThePiratebay-owned-by-CIA.html Why did you post the above to OR-TALK? If you intended it to be some form of humor, you definitely missed the mark.

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread krishna e bera
Could someone post the contact addresses for cashing in? And perhaps some proof that they do (or do not) pay? On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:55:57PM +0200, Timo Schoeler wrote: thus Tom Hek spake: On Jun 23, 2009, at 15:01 PM, Harry Hoffman wrote: At $0.20USD/MB I was able to supplement my

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Scott Bennett spake: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:22:04 +0200 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: http://joyn.org/conspiracy/ThePiratebay-owned-by-CIA.html Why did you post the above to OR-TALK? If you intended it to be some form of humor, you definitely missed the

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Harry Hoffman
Um, sorry... any references made to actually receiving money from a government organization for capturing traffic were meant as a joke. The article was so ludicrous that it (IMO) deserved a humorous response. Too many conspiracy theories going on now-a-days. Cheers, Harry krishna e bera

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Ted Smith
You can't contact them. They come to you after you run a high-bandwidth exit node for a few months or more, depending on your uptime and security profile. ;-) On Tue, 2009-06-23 at 10:17 -0400, krishna e bera wrote: Could someone post the contact addresses for cashing in? And perhaps some proof

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:25:01 +0200 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: thus Scott Bennett spake: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:22:04 +0200 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: http://joyn.org/conspiracy/ThePiratebay-owned-by-CIA.html Why did you post the

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Timo Schoeler
thus Scott Bennett spake: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 16:25:01 +0200 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: thus Scott Bennett spake: On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 13:22:04 +0200 Timo Schoeler timo.schoe...@riscworks.net wrote: http://joyn.org/conspiracy/ThePiratebay-owned-by-CIA.html

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Tom Hek
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Jun 23, 2009, at 16:17 PM, krishna e bera wrote: Could someone post the contact addresses for cashing in? And perhaps some proof that they do (or do not) pay? We were just joking about secret services paying people to run Tor. - - Tom

Strange tor status...

2009-06-23 Thread Andrei Lavreniyuk
Hi! Who exactly can describe me why the status of ReactorRelay is not normal? Please check ReactorRelay's date and time. At present, concerning of the time differences, ReactorRelay is not included to servers list on most sites. In instance https://torstatus.blutmagie.de/ skips ReactorRelay.

RE: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Zinco
I thought it was funny. And knew it was a joke right away. -Original Message- From: owner-or-t...@freehaven.net [mailto:owner-or-t...@freehaven.net] On Behalf Of Harry Hoffman Sent: Tuesday, June 23, 2009 7:27 AM To: or-talk@freehaven.net Subject: Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA

Re: Strange tor status...

2009-06-23 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 18:03:35 +0300 Andrei Lavreniyuk andy.l...@gmail.com wrote: Who exactly can describe me why the status of ReactorRelay is not normal? You are listed as the contact person in the descriptors. Perhaps you should tell us why you keep starting and stopping it. Please

RE: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 08:26:00 -0700 Zinco zi...@comcast.net wrote: I thought it was funny. And knew it was a joke right away. The web site appears to me to be the product of someone's mental health troubles, which is the sort of thing that, in my book at least, doesn't even get to

Re: Conspiracy: Piratebay owned by CIA (TOR involved, also)

2009-06-23 Thread Bill Weiss
Ted Smith(ted...@gmail.com)@Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 10:35:59AM -0400: You can't contact them. They come to you after you run a high-bandwidth exit node for a few months or more, depending on your uptime and security profile. ;-) And here I've been avoiding those guys when they called and wrote!

Re: Strange tor status...

2009-06-23 Thread Andrei Lavreniyuk
Hi Scott, If go through the log I have sent you, you can easily find out that ReactorRelay has different statements (from Exit to Valid) on the each directory servers at the same time. Can you please let me know why it happens? 2009/6/23, Scott Bennett benn...@cs.niu.edu: On Tue, 23

Tor 0.2.1.16-rc is out

2009-06-23 Thread Roger Dingledine
Tor 0.2.1.16-rc speeds up performance for fast exit relays, and fixes a bunch of minor bugs. https://www.torproject.org/download.html.en Changes in version 0.2.1.16-rc - 2009-06-20 o Security fixes: - Fix an edge case where a malicious exit relay could convince a controller that the

Re: Strange tor status...

2009-06-23 Thread Roger Dingledine
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 06:03:35PM +0300, Andrei Lavreniyuk wrote: Who exactly can describe me why the status of ReactorRelay is not normal? Please check ReactorRelay's date and time. At present, concerning of the time differences, ReactorRelay is not included to servers list on most sites. In

Re: Strange tor status...

2009-06-23 Thread Scott Bennett
On Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:56:07 +0300 Andrei Lavreniyuk andy.l...@gmail.com wrote: If go through the log I have sent you, you can easily find out that ReactorRelay has different statements (from Exit to Valid) on the each directory servers at the same time. Can you please let me know why it

many new relays

2009-06-23 Thread grarpamp
150% jump, in such a short time. Not sure I'd welcome that so soon. I don't have a copy of the old cache files from before the jump began. But if someone does, consider putting them up on a filehost or analyzing it a bit more. This really should be looked at in more detail before chalking it up to