Il 07/02/2011 09:47, Marco Predicatori ha scritto:
morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote:
Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in
the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP
belonged to.
That's interesting, because it means that running the node
only if you purchase said services under your real name/accounts or
without sufficient indirection.
defense in depth++
My defense in depth ;) looks that way: Let the state come, let them
accuse you, win the case.
Did it once (german link:
morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote:
Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in
the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP
belonged to.
That's interesting, because it means that running the node away from
home doesn't affect the chance of being
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
thus Marco Predicatori spake:
morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote:
Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in
the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP
belonged to.
That's interesting, because it
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Marco Predicatori ma...@predicatori.it wrote:
morphium, on 02/04/2011 03:08 PM, wrote:
Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in
the data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP
belonged to.
That's interesting, because it
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 03:15:59PM -0800, coderman wrote:
only if you purchase said services under your real name/accounts or
without sufficient indirection.
Hetzner has plenty of nongerman customers, so using an
LLC as an abstraction layer would probably work.
Not sure they would accept
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:08 AM, morphium morph...@morphium.info wrote:
...
Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the
data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP belonged
to.
this is interesting.
just to clarify: you had traffic of interest from a
2011/2/5 coderman coder...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 6:08 AM, morphium morph...@morphium.info wrote:
...
Oh and yes, they took only my hardware @ home, not the Server in the
data center that actually DID run Tor and that the bad IP belonged
to.
this is interesting.
just to clarify:
It happened 4 years ago... they came, took every hardware they could
find, took more than a year to analyze it, they found nothing (they
were looking for child pornography - someone downloaded via my tor
exit from swoopshare) and gave my hardware back after 2 years.
Oh and yes, they took only
It happened 4 years ago... they came, took every hardware they could
find, took more than a year to analyze it, they found nothing (they
were looking for child pornography - someone downloaded via my tor
exit from swoopshare) and gave my hardware back after 2 years.
The trial is still ongoing,
I think
2011/2/4 Matthew pump...@cotse.net:
So are you suing the police if the case is continuing but your hardware has
been returned?
I think they will have to pay compensation after I got my acquittal.
But that has to be checked afterwards.
And, if the case continues at it current ... speed
11 matches
Mail list logo
