Hi
friends..
I am trying to create a stand by database using dataguard and i am getting the
error ' DataGuard remote process startup failed' . In primary
and secondary database oracle agent is running . I have management server
installed in the primary node itself . i have set
I cannot fathom Raid 5 being faster than Raid 1 for writes.
Well in sequential writes like redo log, copy redo log to archive log and
many other cases raid 5 will be faster.
Care to explain how RAID5 will be faster for a redo log write, because I
don't have that understanding of it.
If I'm
(T)hanks (I)n (A)dvance
At 09:48 AM 11/4/02 -0800, you wrote:
sorry
what is that TIA thing on the ned of the message
-Original Message-
From: Gabriel Aragon
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: segunda-feira, 4 de Novembro de 2002 17:04
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
TIA -
Thanks In Advance...
What
is the 'ned of the message'
-Original Message-From: Paulo Gomes
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 10:49
AMTo: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-LSubject: RE:
Moving datafiles, controlfiles, and redos.
sorry
Hi
I am using MTS in 8.1.6.I am wondering one of MTS process is locked 2 table
since morning and this process is taking more CPU.Can I kill that process
like ora_s000_prod by using alter system and then unix kill command?
Thx
-Seema
It depends on your reason for partitioning -- if you mean to drop a partition in
the future (to roll off the 1999 data or whatever) then the ID range is
potentially a valid approach, as long as ID is serial. If you just want to put
chunks on different disk volumes, you could use the type or even
Title: RE: Re Raid 5+
Jared
raid 5 is good over a single disk for the read speed and the fact
you can rebuild if a disk is lost. A raid 5 write includes the
additional overhead of calculating parity, no question about it.
My raid 1+0 spindles are faster than my raid 5 when it comes to
Title: Oracle 817 on Solaris 2.6 moving to Solaris 8
OS upgrade relink all?
We are actually moving from one physical machine to another, but in reality we are just doing and OS upgrade from Sun Solaris 2.6 to Sun Solaris 8. My idea is to just backup the database and restore to the new
Jared - My company has had good luck with Actuate.
http://www.actuate.com/products/server/index.asp
It is reasonably flexible in serving HTML or text reports to users via a Web
interface. It can also create the reports via SQL queries. You can manage
which users can access which reports, and can
so, now you want to date Mr. Gates? I think he's married.
-Original Message-
From: Mike Killough [mailto:mwkillough;hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 12:33 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Red Hat or Suse
Me too. She was unstable.
For those that may be curious, I found the BMC software
that Yechial referred to. Price for 250 users: $60k US.
Plus consulting $$$.
Fairly expensive, I would say.
Jared
Yechiel Adar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/04/2002 12:23 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
If you are, in fact, moving the files to different file systems:
Change the location of the control files in the init.ora.
Startup mount.
alter database rename file '/from/where/it/was' to '/where/it/is/now';
etc.
etc.
alter database open;
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ:
H. I had no such message using Opera 6.05 with Java/JS/Cookies off.
Although, by default, IP logging is on for many webservers, so just about
anywhere you surf to has captured your IP. Probably one reason more why
we have a proxy server here at work.
Rich
Rich Jesse
If the application were to use a table-driven sequence; i.e., select max(keynum) +1
from sequence_table; then it would indeed be database neutral; however, as you
stated, that technique does not scale. Oracle sequences; i.e., those employing
sequence.nextval, are an Oracle construct and are
Michael - In Oracle9i it goes even further. Now there is FIRST_ROWS_1,
FIRST_ROWS_10, and on up to _1000. Just thought you might want to take that
in consideration.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 1:04 PM
Hi Mike,
Your article was very good in describing RBO vs. CBO. I hope
you don't mind
me using it to help better describe why we're switching from
RBO to CBO to
my team.
I forgot to mention this before, but you should also look at Tim Gorman's
excellent paper on the CBO at
Jared - I think I steered you wrong. Apparently Actuate is even costlier.
Gee, maybe you could whip something up in Perl. Do it on your own time so
you can marked it later.
Dennis Williams
DBA, 40%OCP
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002
Oops, I meant so you could MARKET it later.
Dennis Williams
DBA
Lifetouch, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 4:24 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Jared - I think I steered you wrong. Apparently Actuate is even costlier.
Gee, maybe
Well, yes, I am seriously considering that.
Not that I mind doing it, just not sure I have the time.
Jared
DENNIS WILLIAMS [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
11/04/2002 02:23 PM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yechiel,
Just to add to Jared's note, RAID5 does a _lot_ more during a write. It has
to perform what is known as the 'read-modify-write' cycle, where it has to
first read the existing parity for the data that is being written. This is
an I/O to _all_ the disks involved. It then has to calculate
Check out the documentation for the dbms_transaction package. I have used it
previously (dbms_transaction.purge_lost_db_entry). In my case, the cause was
due to a problem in SQL Server (DTS process).
See Docids on Metalink:
67590.1 - PROCEDURE:DBMS_TRANSACTION.PURGE_LOST_DB_ENTRY
100664.1 -
Title: Relation Between Oracle Sessions
Hi all,
A question related to Developer but involves forming sessions at the backend, so would appreciate any help or ideas.
Whenever a form is opened, it opens an Oracle session (can be seen from v$session). Now when we call another form from this
At 10:08 PM 11/4/2002, you wrote:
Whenever a form is opened, it opens an Oracle session (can be seen from
v$session). Now when we call another form from this opened form, (call
form property of forms), it will open another session. If we consider the
main form as the parent form and the form
Can any one tell me how can i read parameter info
from RDF(Reports definition file)
24 matches
Mail list logo
