(or the name of mailing list you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX
Check Note 190435.1 on MetaLink.
[It is under Upcoming Oracle Product Desupports].
At 09:41 AM 13-06-02 -0700, Charlie Mengler wrote:
I just went to Metalink viewed the desupport notices.
I did not see where any 9i version is listed.
Where did you find the notice for 9iR1?
Hemant K Chitale
is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this communication in error, please
re-send this communication to the sender and delete the
original message or any copy of it from your computer
system.
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: [EMAIL
for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
you want to be removed from). You may
also send the HELP command for other information (like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San
Bookmark
Fixed
font
Go to End
Doc ID:
Note:189914.1
Subject:
Recompilation of PLSQL may fail after Upgrading to Oracle9i
(ORA-3113 in UTLRP)
FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
To REMOVE
was that the Alpha processor was priced so high, few
people would buy it and, therefore, Digital could never
achieve economies of scale.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 05 June, 2002 2:09 AM
Peter
Tru64 = 5.0 being desupported for new releases of 9i is OK.
We are upgrading our Tru64 installations from 4.0F to 5.1/5.1A
along with the database upgrades to 9iRelease2.
But Tru64 on Alpha, as such, will continue for some more years.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple
in which
case you must do an ALTER DATABASE RENAME FILE
before you OPEN the database].
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 04 June, 2002 7:18 AM
Migrating 35 Oracle 8.1.7.1 instances, all on external EMC disk, from
Corruption / Internal Errors Possible after Upgrading a Database to
Oracle 9.2.0.1It is vital that you read this alert if upgrading to
Oracle 9.2.0.1 from an earlier release
Versions Affected
This problem affects Oracle databases upgraded from pre-9.0.1 to
9.0.1.X and then to 9.2.0.1.
will NOT be ported to Itanium. It will be HPUX
that will go to Itanium.
The years 2006 and 2011 are sufficiently far in the future :
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 03 June, 2002 11:53 PM
Stephane, Hemant
Below
(like subscribing).
--
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
--
Author: Hemant K Chitale
INET: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fat City Network Services-- (858) 538-5051 FAX: (858) 538-5051
San Diego, California-- Public Internet access / Mailing Lists
So you got a performance improvement by
*disabling* DirectIO (ie, by setting _tru64_directio_disabled=TRUE) ?
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 30 May, 2002 3:48 AM
I joined in on this thread a little bit
Oracle Applications 11.0.3 specifies
that
OPTIMIZER_MODE be set to RULE.
Apps R11 was
originally developed against 8.0.x (8.0.4).
Has anyone changed the OPTIMIZER_MODE
to CHOOSE after upgrading the database to 8.1.7
?
Hemant K Chitalehttp://hkchital.tripod.com
Unfortunately, I, and all of us, have seen the
Pentium
processors in MS-NT/2K.
The general opinion of Pentium/P4 is in the
context
of MS operating systems. And these don't
perform
as well as *nix.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
From:
Mogens Nørgaard
. I don't know how good Online Backups are on NT.
Hemant K Chitale
http://hkchital.tripod.com
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 25 May, 2002 4:33 AM
1) Not pulling any legs. That's what we run.
2) We have a few reasons
The 8.1.7.2.0 Patchset for Tru64 was withdrawn
and replaced by the 8.1.7.2.1 Patchset.
You would be applying the patchset on top of an
8.1.7.0.0 or 8.1.7.1.0 or 8.1.7.1.0B installation.
8.1.7 is certified on Tru64 5.1
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients
for the new SID name].
Changing the databse name requires the
CREATE CONTROLFILE SET DATABASE newname
and the new name as the db_name= in the initSID.ora
file.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, 25 May, 2002 3:08
, might go from PowerPC
to Itanium].
Hemant K Chitale
http://hkchital.tripod.com
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 1:43 AM
Hermat - We are on Tru64 and I couldn't be more pleased. However, I believe
that HP/Compaq has
Is the batch job doing a TRUNCATE table ?
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 8:08 PM
Hi,
It isn't a local managed tablespace problem because I'm still
on 7.3.4 db Besides that I'm changing
No way ! You're pulling a lot of legs
[and hurting a lot of egos who take pride in
pointing out that NT is _not_ an enterprise-class
platform, me included].
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 24 May, 2002 8:00
I second, and third, and fourth that.
Actually, I don't have to spend too much time
with Support for RDBMS issues. It is the
new-fangled technologies -- iAS, Portal, iFS,
Intermedia that I am not comfortable with Support about.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple
I'd never have thought that this was possible
in Advanced Replication
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May, 2002 12:48 AM
At last something that I have experience in.
Just do the following
Nope. .4 is supposed to be the last PSR (patchset release)
for 8.1.7
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May, 2002 4:33 AM
I hear that .5 is right around the corner.
Vinny
--- Ruth Gramolini
An upgrade wouldn't cost anything. It would be free
as part of your support contract.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, 23 May, 2002 2:41 AM
Kevin,
I appreciate your testing efforts. Now to convince
The patchsets _are_ cumulative. You can
go direct from 8.1.7.0 to 8.1.7.3 or to 8.1.7.4
[we normally don't go to the latest patchset level
but wait a few weeks or a couple of months to
see that no major issues are reported with the
latest patchsetlevel].
Hemant K Chitale
- Original
The bane of trying to keep up with technology.
But why OpenVMS and not Tru64, then.
We have a large number of Tru64 Oracle Databases
(we do have OpenVMSs for Promis databases
used in manufacturing, I believe).
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE
NO, THERE IS NO WAY TO INCREASE THE SHARED_POOL_SIZE
WITHOUT SHUT DOWN (sic) THE DATABASE below 9i.
Please don't use All-Caps. I remember the first time I used
All-Caps on a NewsGroup about 7 or 8 years ago, I was roundly
berated.
Hemant K Chitale
- Original Message -
To: Multiple
301 - 329 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
