RE: 10053 trace

2003-05-29 Thread Niall Litchfield
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sai Selvaganesan Sent: 28 May 2003 06:15 To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Subject: Re: 10053 trace hi thanks for the info.i could make it work for some 9i sqls but a particular sql is not generating trace. the 10053 trace file has only the query

Re: 10053 trace

2003-05-28 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
: hi thanks for the info.i could make it work for some 9i sqls but a particular sql is not generating trace. the 10053 trace file has only the query para but no other details. the query selects from a simple view built on a table. will this make a difference? here is the query select id from

10053 trace

2003-05-27 Thread Sai Selvaganesan
hi gurus i am trying to generate 10053 trace in 9i and have met with no success. i used both 'alter session set events' and 'dbms_system.set_ev'. i used the above two to generate 10053 trace for the same query in 8i w/o problems. has anything changed in 9i? can you please help me

Re: 10053 trace

2003-05-27 Thread Kirtikumar Deshpande
It has worked for me in 9i as well. What is it that you are not getting? Please review Wolfgang's 10053 Events paper at http://www.centrexcc.com. He may have any 9i specific information. - Kirti --- Sai Selvaganesan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi gurus i am trying to generate 10053 trace

Re: 10053 trace

2003-05-27 Thread Wolfgang Breitling
At 04:15 PM 5/27/2003 -0800, you wrote: hi gurus i am trying to generate 10053 trace in 9i and have met with no success. i used both 'alter session set events' and 'dbms_system.set_ev'. i used the above two to generate 10053 trace for the same query in 8i w/o problems. has anything changed in 9i

Re: 10053 trace

2003-05-27 Thread Sai Selvaganesan
hi thanks for the info.i could make it work for some 9i sqls but a particular sql is not generating trace. the 10053 trace file has only the query para but no other details. the query selects from a simple view built on a table. will this make a difference? here is the query select id from

Re: 10053 trace

2003-05-27 Thread Tim Gorman
, thus ensuring that the CBO will need to parse. If the CBO doesn't need to parse, then event 10053 doesn't generate trace output... Hope this helps... -Tim on 5/27/03 5:15 PM, Sai Selvaganesan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi gurus i am trying to generate 10053 trace in 9i and have met

10053 trace in 9i

2003-01-20 Thread Freeman Robert - IL
I'm looking at the results of a 10053 trace from 9i. I'm not finding any real documentation for the following parameters in the base table access cost section: tb_sel rsc_cpu rsc_io ix_sel I believe that these all combine somehow to define a cost for a specific index access but I'm not sure how

Re: Help me read my 10053 trace file

2002-11-22 Thread K Gopalakrishnan
Shao: I think your program has become a victim of the new costing model for bitmap indexes which was introduced in 8.0.6. Basically the new costing model assumes the 80% of the rows are costed in the old model and 20% of the rows are costed as they are spread across ALL blocks. Let us assume

Help me read my 10053 trace file

2002-11-21 Thread Shao, Chunning
I have a query in which the predictate is like this: WHERE ln.metro_id = i_metro_id AND l.metro_id = :b1 ANd eld.metro_id(+) = :b1 AND ln.status_desc = 'ACTIVE' AND ln.daset_id = ld.daset_id (+) AND