RE: ANSI SQL Compliance (Oracle vs. SQL Server)

2001-05-04 Thread paquette stephane
t; || To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > || Subject: ANSI SQL Compliance (Oracle vs. SQL > Server) > || > || > || Which RDBMS is more ANSI SQL compliant, Oracle or > MS > || SQL Server? > || > || I have some frustrated SQL Server developers that > only > || u

RE: ANSI SQL Compliance (Oracle vs. SQL Server)

2001-05-03 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Hi, I don't think Oracle is *fully* compliant, but compared to others (except for DB/2) it fairly compliant. According to Oracle's own document, O8iR2 is fully compliant at entry-level. In addition to full compliance at the Entry level, Oracle complies partially at the Transitional, Intermediate,

RE: ANSI SQL Compliance (Oracle vs. SQL Server)

2001-05-03 Thread Mohan, Ross
tiple recipients of list ORACLE-L || Subject: ANSI SQL Compliance (Oracle vs. SQL Server) || || || Which RDBMS is more ANSI SQL compliant, Oracle or MS || SQL Server? || || I have some frustrated SQL Server developers that only || understand how to write inner and outer joins using || SQL Ser

ANSI SQL Compliance (Oracle vs. SQL Server)

2001-05-03 Thread Walter K
Which RDBMS is more ANSI SQL compliant, Oracle or MS SQL Server? I have some frustrated SQL Server developers that only understand how to write inner and outer joins using SQL Server's syntax. Don't DB2, Informix and Sybase use the same method of defining joins as predicates? Just curious. Mayb