RE: AQ, RAC and delay

2003-06-20 Thread Hemant K Chitale
: RE: AQ, RAC and delay o.com Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] ity.com 06/19/2003 10:29 AM Please respond to ORACLE-L

Re: AQ, RAC and delay

2003-06-19 Thread Hemant K Chitale
Although MCPD may default to 700centiseconds [although I have seen a much lower value on 9.2 on Tru64], in most cases, delays of 7seconds don't occur [and shouldn't be acceptable ?!]. I do have a 9iRAC environment but am comfortably using mcpd=0. And I have AQ in an 8.1.7 single-instance

RE: AQ, RAC and delay

2003-06-19 Thread K Gopalakrishnan
Hemant: You are right. 7 seconds is the MAX difference, but the control files are synced every 3 seconds during the 'split brain' check. So most of the cases, it is 3 seconds with the maximum of 7 seconds subject to the MCPD settings. KG Best Regards,K Gopalakrishnan -Original

RE: AQ, RAC and delay

2003-06-19 Thread Rajesh . Rao
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: AQ, RAC and delay o.com Sent

RE: AQ, RAC and delay

2003-06-19 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: RE: AQ, RAC and delay I haven't tried with mcpd=0 yet ... Raj Rajendra dot Jamadagni at nospamespn dot com All Views expressed in this email are strictly personal. QOTD: Any clod can have facts, having

AQ, RAC and delay

2003-06-17 Thread Jamadagni, Rajendra
Title: AQ, RAC and delay A colleague casually mentioned that in RAC, the test to de-queue an AQ set-up from BOTH instances didn't succeed. The side where we were enqueuing was able to see queued messages faster than the 'other' side. About 7-8 seconds ... that got me thinking