To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 9:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Advice needed please
Thanks Dennis.
Anything whether it be a reaction or an answer,
is welcome.
Regards
Lee
-Original Message-
Sent: 30 May 2002 15
Oracle 8.0.5
Tru64 4.0f
One of our developers here is writing a utility to provide fast unloads of
tables (to replace fastunloader as it happens)
His problem is as follows. Start from the bottom and work your way up. I
would be really grateful if anyone can offer up some alternatives for us.
Lee - Just some reactions, few answers.
- Generally a process like this will be disk-bound, not CPU-bound, so idle
CPU time is to be expected unless your disk is REALLY fast.
- Multiple simultaneous full-table scans may not be any faster because the
disk heads may need to flit to and fro in
Thanks Dennis.
Anything whether it be a reaction or an answer, is welcome.
Regards
Lee
-Original Message-
Sent: 30 May 2002 15:08
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Lee - Just some reactions, few answers.
- Generally a process like this will be disk-bound, not CPU-bound,
, 2002 9:43 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: RE: Advice needed please
Thanks Dennis.
Anything whether it be a reaction or an answer, is welcome.
Regards
Lee
-Original Message-
Sent: 30 May 2002 15:08
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L