Hehehe... I got it covered on all fronts. And no, it
is not a joke. Unfortunately, the DIQ's (Damagement
In Question) is local, while all the systems are
remote. Gods forbid they should ask the people who
are technically competent how long something will take
prior to promising a schedule to
I hear you. Some one came up with the idea that 30+
HPUX 10.20, Oracle 7.3.3 systems could be updated to
HPUX 11.x, Oracle 8.1.7 in less than 36 hours, with
only 2 dba's and 2 sysadms, remotely.
I shudder to think of the psychoactive compound
dosages that led to this conclusion. Oh well, I've
Is Las Vegas laying odds on this? I've got a few bucks I would wager
against...
This is not just unreasonable, but insane - even assuming that
everything goes perfectly (it won't). It is more reasonable to assume
that a horse is a perfect sphere or that the Israeli-Palestinian
problem could be
We just had someone from Oracle in yesterday who said
a) it will be a 9.0.2 feature
b) 9.0.2 won't be out until June, 2002
Unfortunately they are still holding fixed to forcing me to come in on
Christmas weekend to upgrade to 8.1.7. For no good reason. Forcing me to
cancel the plans I've had
Ain't being a DBA glamorous???
Me, I'm just in it because I heard that DBA's get all the chicks :)
Believe me, I feel your pain. I have more Oracle 7.3.4 databases here to upgrade than
I can say without embarassment. That's what I get for being the new hire. :)
A fellow DBA,
Scott Lockhart
Same here!
I have an HP-UX upgrade and an Oracle upgrade over the holidays.
It's been on the queue for more than a year.
bye-bye Oracle 7.3.4 Woo Hoo
__ _ =
-o)/ / (_)__ __ __ | Ed Sherman |
/\\ /__/ /
]
Sent by: cc:
root@fatcity.Subject: RE: RE: Has anyone heard of
Mirror Accessible?
com
]
shermanej@ecc
ic.com To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: cc:
root@fatcity.Subject: RE: RE: Has anyone
heard of Mirror Accessible?
com
12/05/01
If I were you I would find a conflict during your testing against the new
version. If confronted with a problem, few managers will want to press on
and put the production system at risk. Some folks would say this is passive
aggression. I'd remind them it is preferable to outright aggression.
Title: RE: Has anyone heard of Mirror Accessible?
Just got back from OOW and that 'might' be available in Release 2 of 9i. Which is due out in Spring 2002.
Nick.
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Jay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:45 PM
To: Multiple
to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: CHITALE Hemant Krishnarao/Prin DBA/CSM/ST Group)
Subject: RE: Has anyone heard of Mirror Accessible?
Can anyone confirm this? I've been searching technet and metalink
Yeah,
The CEO needs to be anonymously informed that he needs a CIO with a higher
degree of intelligence and technical expertise. The current one is a waste
of flesh.
--Scott
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 30,
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: (bcc: CHITALE Hemant Krishnarao/Prin DBA/CSM/ST Group)
Subject: RE: Has anyone heard of Mirror
My CIO woes continue. My manager has been told by the CIO that Oracle has a
product called mirror accessible which allows the database to be mirrored
for reporting purposes. He wants us to use this product.
Now I'm familiar with the EMC solution, Quest's Shareplex, Oracle Standby
and Oracle
Only thing I can think of off the top of my head is a standby database
opened in read only mode. Its one of the purposes totted for that
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 9:47 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
My CIO woes continue. My manager has been
9i has a new feature on standby databases that let's you run reports in read
only while continuing the managed recovery. I think they call it a logical
standby database. See the 9i DataGuard manual for more information. (I
just happened to be looking into this lately). This might be what they
Jay - I did a search on Google and that returned nada, so I don't believe
that mirror accessible is a bona fide term. However, looking at your words
Oracle has a product . . . database to be mirrored for reporting purposes,
he might be referring to Oracle9i's Real Application Clusters.
Ah, this sounds likely. And it might explain why they were keen on having
us upgrade to 9i. That's the problem with receiving the request filtered
through two additional levels of people.
Jay Miller
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 1:56 PM
To: Multiple recipients of
Isn't that just in release 2 though? My understanding is that its not out
yet.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 11:36 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Ah, this sounds likely. And it might explain why they were keen on having
us upgrade to 9i. That's the
There seems to be a bit of confusion here. RAC is not related to
standby database. DataGuard is the big enhancement for standby
databases in 9i. RAC is the name for the 9i incarnation of OPS
(Oracle Parallel Server.). If the database to be mirrored, then it
is completely independent of
Can anyone confirm this? I've been searching technet and metalink and can't
turn up any details.
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 3:01 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Isn't that just in release 2 though? My understanding is that its not out
yet.
Dataguard is available in 901 ... of course we don't use it.
oraclei@angel-TICK2 dgmgrl
DGMGRL for IBM/AIX RISC System/6000: Version 9.0.1.0.0 - Production.
(c) Copyright 2001 Oracle Corporation. All rights reserved.
Welcome to DGMGRL, type help for information.
DGMGRL help
The following
I'm sure it has a few bugs in Metalink against it so a responsible site
wouldn't implement it until after Jan. 1. ;-)
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2001 4:00 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Dataguard is available in 901 ... of course we don't use it.
23 matches
Mail list logo
