Tony,
come out of the woodwork more often!
By standby I mean Oracle's standby database, now named DataGuard. since
this *is* a running database and can be opened for read access in 8i
and read/write (with logical standby running) in 9i, it's another
license. And I have no objection to it be charg
Hi Kip
I think you got the gist of it.
In regards to your Q on DR, I assume that SunGuard and IBM is
a DR facility hosted by them. How would you be recovering your
database?
Tapes? Then that should be OK.
Filesystem replication or one of Oracle's features? Then you have to
get another set
Hi Rachel
Good to hear from you. I am always on the list. Just
being
a lurker.
I am surprise that you are paying for a standby if the standby
DB is not being used at the same time as the Pri.
By standby, do you mean something like Oracle replication or
Dataguard
where you are using Oracle's ut
Ethan
This 10 day grace only applies to Clusters/Failovers not Standbys.
So unless your DR is in a Global Cluster you can't apply the
10 days grace.
As for a Hot standby DR site where the server is larger than the
Primary server, I would think it reasonable to pay for the size
of the Primary. B
Tom
At 05:14 AM 16/01/2003 -0800, you wrote:
>Jared,
>
>why doesn't it seem right?
Because if you use filesystem replication, the standby/DR server
does not have Oracle up and running. Oracle does not come
into the equation at all.
ta
tony
_ / |Tony Jambu, Database&Web
Hi Tom,
Contracts not signed but I believe there is a proposal that has an allowance
for 8 or 10 hours of testing beyond the restore time with extra charges for
running longer. Oh, and I did manage to get them to include a place to collect
archived redo logs (which were originally going to be co
Kip,
in your situation (as I understand it), I think would fall into the
following scenario:
Don't ask and don't tell.
clearly, you are not intending on running your production system at your
data recovery site. your intent is to use the site to (as you said): test
recovery to make sure it can
Hi,
I've missed some of this thread so apologies if this has been touched on
already. The info-from-Oracle below refers to Backup/Failover/Standby.
Backup : We're OK.
Failover: Hmm. Tru64 cluster. Think we're OK based on what I read...
Standby : I was shot down on this one because the
This is interesting...
So in the event of a true DR where a DR center has servers co-located and
are available for hundreds of potential customers do we need to pay for the
license on the box we use at the DR center if it is used more than 10 days a
year? Does one pay after they have gone over th
Title: RE: Important - Oracle Pricing on Standby/DR/Failover databases
and how about Oracle saying something like ...
"And in return to you making excess payment to meet our unrealistic demands, we will deliver bug-free software ...&q
Jared,
why doesn't it seem right?
in the case where we are running a standby database, are we not using the
software? sure, the users are not directly connected. but every
transaction that they enter in the primary database is being posted to the
standby. if we were not required to pay for thi
Tony,
Good to see your fingerprints here!
I had always gone on the theory that I would need at least two of the
licenses, one for production and one for the standby server. I hadn't
thought about one for the DR site, on the theory, that since DR was up
and running ONLY when production was not, it
Thanks Tony.
Looks like Larry E is trying to boost revenues in a down
economy by any means necessary.
You're right, this doesn't seem right.
Jared
On Wednesday 15 January 2003 19:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi All
>
> For those sites with either a standby, DR or failover database,
> the fol
Hi Jared
I have a reply from someone who does not want to be identified.
This is his case.
His company tried reasoning and discussing it with Oracle
and even tried a compromised (which I would not be happy with)
He company put forward to Oracle to pay for the full licence
on the production serve
Hi All
For those sites with either a standby, DR or failover database,
the following information is very important to you. You could be in
breach of Oracle's Licensing agreement and could cost you $100,000s
if not millions $$
(Read the summary at the end if you want to skip the
details)
In the
15 matches
Mail list logo
