RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-12 Thread Dave Morgan
s advice. Dave Rachel wrote: > Subject: RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs > well yeah... >that's the whole point of USING DNS, so that it will work like that --- Djordje Jankovic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am not talking whether putting DNS entry works, but am jus

RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-12 Thread mohammed bhatti
t; > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > > Subject: Re: Listeners listening to multiple IPs > > > > > > it's not so much a feature of the listener as it > is of DNS as far as I > > know. One of the reasons it's best not to > hard-code IP ad

RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Jared . Still
achel Carmichael To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Listeners listening to m

RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Khedr, Waleed
I used to define it on localhost (127.0.0.1) and this worked great with all ip addresses (only on Solaris). Did not work on NT! Regards, Waleed -Original Message- Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 9:40 AM To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L Something I learned today, but haven't

RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Rachel Carmichael
cipients of list ORACLE-L > > Subject: Re: Listeners listening to multiple IPs > > > > > > it's not so much a feature of the listener as it is of DNS as far > as I > > know. One of the reasons it's best not to hard-code IP addresses > into > >

RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Djordje Jankovic
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, December 11, 2001 11:50 AM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: Listeners listening to multiple IPs > > > it's not so much a feature of the listener as it is of DNS as far as I > know. One of the reaso

RE: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Djordje Jankovic
1 PM > To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L > Subject: Re: Listeners listening to multiple IPs > > > Hi > > I did this (don't know wether it's documented or not), but somebody > recommended to split it up into 2 listeners (1 for each interface) to > have a bett

Re: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Stefan Jahnke
Hi I did this (don't know wether it's documented or not), but somebody recommended to split it up into 2 listeners (1 for each interface) to have a better way of controlling the workload (especially with multiple instances). Made sense to me. Djordje Jankovic schrieb: > > Something I learned to

Re: Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Rachel Carmichael
it's not so much a feature of the listener as it is of DNS as far as I know. One of the reasons it's best not to hard-code IP addresses into the listener.ora is because when you do a failover, or combine machines as you have, the listener.ora and tnsnames.ora files need to be updated. If you use

Listeners listening to multiple IPs

2001-12-11 Thread Djordje Jankovic
Something I learned today, but haven't seen it documented anywhere and would like to see whether anybody has come across it. We have a Sun server (call it oracle.acme.com). It came to life by combining two machines (oracle1.acme.com and oracle2.acme.com). So now it has two IP addresses: hme0: x