Hey Jerry,
Is this hardware dependant in any way? I have several instances of
8.1.6.0 and none of them have ever done anything like that. Then again, we
are not a 24/7 shop and I am running cold backups every night, maybe that is
why.
Kev
- Original Message -
To: Multiple recipients
I have an Oracle 8.1.6 instance on an NT Server. The application has only a
few users. Very often throughout the day it seems response time drops to
about 20 seconds. By the time I log on to look at the problem everything is
back to normal. If I do a simple query the result is returned
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 17:30
I have an Oracle 8.1.6 instance on an NT Server. The application has only
a
few users. Very often throughout the day it seems response time drops to
about 20
Since you mention there are only a few users, I would take a look at the
jobs these users are running. Maybe one of these users is firing off a
poorly tuned job that brings the database to a grinding halt.
Is the database the only product on the Server? Or are there other
applications ( email
There is a bug with some version of Oracle (I believe it was 8.1.6.0.0, but
don't quote me on that), where even with NO users, oracle.exe would
eventually consume your whole CPU. The CPU utilization ramps up after a db
restart until it gets to 99 or 100.
Open Task Manager and check the
Interesting, i have never heard of this bug. What do you mean, all of the
sudden it will suck down the whole processor? How many users?
-Original Message-
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 3:37 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
There is a bug with some version of Oracle (I
Walski" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: NT Server very slow
Since you mention there are only a few users, I would take a look at the
jobs these users are running. Maybe on
Hi Kevin,
Yes, it will suck down the whole processor. We had a new implementation,
with ZERO users, that had the problem.
It is a memory leak of some sort. 8163 fixed it.
- Jerry
- Original Message -
To: "Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, March
cant find it
-Original Message-
From: Jerry C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 23, 2001 4:31 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L
Subject: Re: NT Server very slow
check out Doc ID 941798 at Metalink...
- Original Message -
To: [EMAIL
