Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi!
Of
course you have to plan your servers' capacity accordingly, that in the event of
node failure, the other node will not get too loaded. When one node crashes, the
second one has to deal with queries and transactions of both servers and we must
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi Rajesh,
Thanks for
the detailed reply and I really appreciate that. Certain clarifications.
1.
With reference to what you said about using both the
nodes, you meant that we can install another database (lets say for reporting purpose)
or/and also
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi Hussain,
Replies
are inline .
With
reference to what you said about using both the nodes, you meant that we can
install another database (lets say for reporting purpose) or/and also 9iAS on
one node and our main production database
different on RAC?
We have the licensed RAC and Oracle Fail Safe CDs, so that is not an issue. I also
believe that setting up RAC is more complex, so we wanted to confirm that if Fail Safe
gives us HA, 24x7, and any change in node shifting (when active is down, passive
becomes active) is transparent
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Hi Hussain !
RAC can have Active-Active or Active-Passive combination for two nodes. While OFS can't give you Active-Active combination of two nodes. Basically a resource sharing is not possible in Oracle Fail safe so one resource can be used by only one
Title: RE: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
Answers in line...
-- I also believe that setting up RAC is more complex,
That's not totally true, For a DBA it shouldn't matter much, whether he is setting up RAC or OFS. But yes relatively RAC is a bit complex to manage.
-- and any change in node
of list ORACLE-L
Hello all,
We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes,
using W2K, and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the
purpose of high availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either
RAC or Oracle Fail Safe. The confusion is over
Hello all,
We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes, using W2K,
and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the purpose of high
availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either RAC or Oracle Fail Safe.
The confusion is over the fact
:44 PM
Hello all,
We have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes,
using W2K, and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the
purpose of high availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either
RAC or Oracle Fail Safe. The confusion is over
have setup a Microsoft Cluster Server (MSCS) cluster, with two nodes, using W2K,
and now are in the process of deploying Oracle 9i on it. For the purpose of high
availability (HA), we are deliberating on setting up either RAC or Oracle Fail Safe.
The confusion is over the fact that if we get HA
:
Sent by: Subject: Re: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
[EMAIL PROTECTED
PROTECTED]
07/16/2003 10:59 AM
Please respond to ORACLE-L
To: Multiple recipients of list ORACLE-L [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject:Re: RAC or Oracle Fail Safe
EE is not required to FailSafe. It comes at no cost with Standard Edition
as well
12 matches
Mail list logo